Early ctDNA reduction may identify patients with stable disease and long OS on tebentafusp.

Authors

null

Dan Feng

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Dan Feng , Laura Collins , Margaret K. Callahan , Ryan J. Sullivan , Sophie Piperno-Neumann , Paul D. Nathan , Jessica Cecile Hassel , Howard Goodall , Chris Holland , Koustubh Ranade , Alexander Noor Shoushtari

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Immunocore Ltd., Abingdon, United Kingdom, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Institut Curie, Paris, France, Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Northwood, United Kingdom, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany, Immunocore LLC, Rockville, MD

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Immunocore

Background: Tebentafusp, a bispecific (gp100 × CD3) ImmTAC showed significant overall survival (OS) benefit (HR 0.51) versus investigator’s choice in a Phase (Ph) 3 trial in first line (1L) HLA-A*02:01+ adult patients (pts) with metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) [Nathan NEJM 2021]. In Ph2 and Ph3 trials of tebentafusp, OS was improved regardless of RECIST best response and the degree of early reduction in ctDNA was a better predictor of OS [Carvajal Nat Med 2022; Sullivan AACR 2023]. Here we explored whether early on-treatment reduction in ctDNA could distinguish pts with stable disease (SD) and long OS vs those with SD and short OS in a Ph3 trial of tebentafusp in 1L mUM pts. Methods: 1L HLA-A*02:01+ pts with mUM received 68 mcg tebentafusp weekly intravenously after intra-patient dose escalation (NCT03070392). Response was assessed by investigators per RECISTv1.1. Sera collected at baseline (BL) and week 9 on tebentafusp were analyzed for ctDNA using targeted mPCR-NGS assay for mutations in 15 genes including GNAQ, GNA11, SF3B1, CYSLTR2, PLCB4 and EIF1AX. Landmark OS from week 9 was analyzed in subsets with ≥0-3 log reductions in mean tumor molecules (MTM) per ml of serum on treatment. Data cutoff 11-Nov-2022. Results: 76/245 (36%) tebentafusp-treated pts had best response of SD, with a median OS of 29 months and were evaluable for ctDNA. Baseline tumor burden as assessed by sum of longest lesion diameters and percentage of pts with elevated BL serum LDH were greater in the subset with < 1 year (yr) OS (median 70 mm and 64%, respectively) than in subsets with OS ≥ 1 yr (median 42 mm, 11%) or OS ≥ 2 yrs (median 31 mm, 9%). Almost half (36/76; 47%) of all SD pts had detectable ctDNA mutations in one or more UM genes at baseline. Baseline ctDNA levels were similar across survival groups. By week 9 on-treatment, ctDNA reduction was observed in 34/36 (94%) evaluable SD pts, including 29/36 (81%) with ≥ 0.5 log reduction, 18/36 (50%) with ≥ 2 log reduction and 16/36 (44%) with undetectable ctDNA (clearance). Deeper reductions in ctDNA were associated with better OS (Table). Conclusions: In this Ph3 trial, ctDNA reduction by week 9 on tebentafusp was strongly associated with improved OS in pts with best RECIST SD. Early ctDNA reduction may predict SD patients with long OS on tebentafusp.

ctDNA subsetN (%)OS hazard ratio (95% CI)*≥ 1-year OS %≥ 2 year OS %
All stable disease with evaluable ctDNA76 (100%)NA73%51%
ctDNA detected at baseline36/76 (47%)NA78%48%
ctDNA not detected at baseline40/76 (53%)NA90%72%
No decrease by week 92/36 (6%)NA50%50%
Any (>0 log) decrease by week 934/36 (94%)1.02 (0.14-7.67)79%48%
≥0.5 log29/36 (81%)0.61 (0.23-1.64)83%53%
≥2 log18/36 (50%)0.33 (0.14-0.78)89%72%
≥3 log (ctDNA clearance)16/36 (44%)0.28 (0.12-0.67)94%75%

*HRs estimated from Kaplan-Meier analysis for subsets above vs below ctDNA reduction threshold.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Other Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 9589)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.9589

Abstract #

9589

Poster Bd #

352

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts