Effect of overexpression of ERK1/2 and MDR1 on chemoresistance in advanced gastric cancer patients.

Authors

SUSHMITA GHOSH

SUSHMITA GHOSH

Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India

SUSHMITA GHOSH , Ranita Pal , Tanuma Mistry , Pranab Kumar Sahoo , Sutapa Mahata , Sinjini Sarkar , Trisha Choudhury , Raya Banerjee , Jayanta Chakrabarti , Kalyan Kusum Mukherjee , Neyaz Alam , Syamsundar Mandal , Vilas Nasare

Organizations

Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India, Chiittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India

Research Funding

Institutional Funding
Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, India

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is late diagnosed disease with a poor prognosis. The emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) increases the disease burden, and treatment failure in the patients. Several molecular and circulating biomarkers have been identified and evaluated for the clinical relevance in the management of gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to decipher the involvement of ERK1/2 and MDR1 in relation to MDR phenotype and major clinicopathological characteristics in gastric cancer patients. This will help to select effective drug combinations to improve the treatment success rate. Methods: This study recruited 64 individuals with newly diagnosed gastric cancer between 2019 and 2022. Patients were recommended for surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). NACT group treated with docetaxel (60 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2), leucovorin (200 mg/m2), and 5-fluorouracil (2,600 mg/m2 as a 24 hr infusion), all given on day 1 and administered every 2 weeks before surgery. Based on CECT report, patients were categorized as responders (CRs), partial responders (PRs), and non-responders (NRs). Tissue and blood samples were analyzed for ERK1/2 and MDR1expression using IHC, immuno-blotting and qRT-PCR analyses. Rhodamine123 (Rh123) accumulation assay and flowcytometry was performed to measure the degree of resistance among patients. Descriptive statistics, and Pearson’s Chi-square test was carried out to evaluate the expression distribution of ERK1/2 and MDR1. Results: Out of 64 patients, between the ages of 41-60 (53.08±10.51), 54.5% have ≥5 cm tumor size in the antrum site (56.1%) and diagnosed with stage III (56.1%). Majority of observations were intestinal type (60.6%) with lymphovascular invasion (71.2%). Among all 29.4%, 20.6% and 50.0% were CRs, PRs, & NRs respectively and 36.5% patients underwent NACT. The IHC scoring analysis revealed 25 (37.9%) & 18 (28.6%) individuals for ERK1/2 and 18 (27.3%) and 26 (39.4%) individuals for MDR1 had moderate to strong expressions respectively. Simultaneously, the expressions were highly significant with tumor site (antrum), tumor size (≥5 cm), wall thickening (radiological finding), signet ring cell carcinoma, grade 3, stage III (T3N2), NRs, lymphovascular, peritoneal and serosal invasions (p=0.000). ERK1/2 was more prevalent in diffuse type patients (p=0.000). Also, protein and mRNA level for both genes were more pronounced in NACT group (p<0.005). Flowcytometry showed FLOT receivers had lower Rh123 accumulation, indicating MDR1overexpression (11.5± 8.9) compared to baseline (49.5 ±38.3). The Pearson χ2 test revealed positive correlation between ERK1/2 and MDR1 (p=0.000). Conclusions: ERK1/2 and MDR1 found to over-express in stage III, predicts the degree of resistance and MDR phenotype in the GC patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16051)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16051

Abstract #

e16051

Abstract Disclosures