A phase II study of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcoma: Results of expansion cohorts.

Authors

null

Ciara Marie Kelly

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Ciara Marie Kelly , Viswatej Avutu , Ping Chi , Mark Andrew Dickson , Mrinal M. Gounder , Mary Louise Keohan , Sujana Movva , Evan Rosenbaum , Emma Cordover , Charlotte Eielson Ariyan , Edmund Bartlett , Aimee Marie Crago , Samuel Singer , Cristina R. Antonescu , Sinchun Hwang , Joseph Patrick Erinjeri , Kenneth Seier , Li-Xuan Qin , William D. Tap , Sandra P. D'Angelo

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center - Fellowship (GME Office), New York, NY, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Sarcoma Medical Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck and Amgen, Cycle for Survival, from NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant p30 CA008748, Angiosarcoma Awareness, Inc foundation provided funding for travel reimbursement for angiosarcoma participants in the expansion cohort

Background: The open-label, single-center phase II study of T-VEC and pembrolizumab in patients with advanced sarcoma met its primary endpoint and demonstrated a best objective response rate of 30% at 24 weeks per RECIST v1.1 (Kelly CM, et al, Jama Oncology, 2020). Responses were seen in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), myxofibrosarcoma, (MFS), epithelioid sarcoma (ES), cutaneous angiosarcoma (AS), and undifferentiated sarcoma not otherwise specified. Here, we report the efficacy observed in three histology specific expansion cohorts: 1) UPS/MFS, 2) cutaneous AS and 3) ES. Methods: Patients refractory to ≥ 1 prior line of systemic therapy or declined standard of care systemic therapy received pembrolizumab intravenously and intratumoral T-VEC injections on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was best objective response (ORR, complete and partial responses per RECIST v 1.1) by 24 weeks estimated for each subtype-specific cohort. Secondary objectives included: adverse events (AEs, TRAEs), median PFS and correlatives. Results: Twenty-one patients enrolled in the expansion cohorts: median age 72 years (range: 39-85), male 57%, ≤ 1 prior line of therapy (43%). Treatment was well tolerated in twenty patients; one patient discontinued study therapy due to grade 3 immune mediated hepatitis. Nineteen patients were evaluable for efficacy (one patient withdrew from the study and another discontinued treatment before week 24). Subtype specific best ORR by 24 weeks per RECIST v 1.1: UPS/MFS – 11% (n = 1/9)[95% CI: 0.0-0.48]; AS – 43% (n = 3/7)[95% CI: 0.1-0.82]; ES – 0% (n = 0/3). The best ORR overall for the AS cohort was 71% (n = 5/7)[95% CI: 0.03-0.95]. Median PFS (weeks) was 14.9 [CI:7-111] for UPS/MFS and 54 [95% CI: 3- not reached] for AS (Table). Conclusions: TVEC and pembrolizumab demonstrated acceptable safety and promising anti-tumor activity in cutaneous AS [head & neck (n = 4) and Stewart-Treves syndrome involving the upper extremity (n = 1)]. Five AS patients experienced a partial response with durable disease control, remaining on study for 1-2 years or more. Two delayed responses were observed in the AS cohort after the pre-specified 24-week criteria. One AS responder progressed on immune checkpoint inhibition prior to study entry. Correlative analyses are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03069378.

UPS/MFS
(n = 10*)
Cut. AS
(n = 8*)
ES
(N = 3)
Median Age (range)[years]69 (48-81)80 (72-85)63 (39-70)
Prior treatment (%)
≤ 2 regimens
≥ 3regimens

7 (70)
3 (30)

4 (50)
4 (50)

2 (66.6)
1 (33.3)
Prior immunotherapy (%)2 (20)1 (12.5)0 (0)
≥ Grade 3 TRAE (%)0 (0)1 (hepatitis) (12.5%)0 (0)
Best ORR at 24 weeks n (%)[CI]1 (11) [0.0-0.48]3 (43) [0.1-0.82]0 (0)
Best ORR overall n (%)1 (11)5 (71)0 (0)
Clinical benefit rate (%)6 (67)5 (71)1 (33.3)
Median PFS (weeks)14.9 (CI: 7-110)54 (CI: 3- NR)---

*One patient was evaluable for toxicity but not evaluable for efficacy because they came off study prior to week 24.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Soft Tissue Tumors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03069378

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 11570)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.11570

Abstract #

11570

Poster Bd #

504

Abstract Disclosures