Tislelizumab in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for lymph node‐positive bladder cancer.

Authors

null

Xiao Yang

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Xiao Yang , Qiang Cao , Pengchao Li , Lingkai Cai , Juntao Zhuang , Qiang Lyu

Organizations

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
beigene

Background: Although multiple single-arm clinical trials have shown promising pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant ICIs combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in MIBC, lymph node‐positive bladder cancer is generally excluded. Our specific aim was to compare the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Methods: In this single arm phase II study, eligible patients had cT2-T4a N+ M0 MIBC, cisplatin-eligible, and to be planned radical cystectomy (RC). Patients received tislelizumab 200 mg in day D8, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 D2, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 D1 and D8 every 21 days for 3 or 4 cycles. RC was performed within 6 weeks after last dose treatment. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0). Secondary endpoints included pathologic downstaging ( < ypT2), EFS, OS and safety. Results: By Jan 2023, 17 eligible pts (2cT2, 10 cT3, 5 cT4) were enrolled. 14 pts have completed neoadjuvant therapy, with median age of 67 (60-81) years, among whom 10 pts underwent RC and two declined RC. According to RECIST 1.1, 6 pts achieved a clinical complete response (cCR)(6/14,42.8%). Pathological results revealed 5 pCR (ypT0N0, 50%), 3 ypT1N0, and 2 ypT2/T3N0. A complete nodal response (pN0) occurred in 10 (100%) pts post- tislelizumab +chemotherapy and 8 ( < ypT2N0,80%) pts achieved pathologic downstaging. Most common neoadjuvant therapy related AEs of any grade were hematologic toxicities (11/14,78.5%), nausea (9/14,64.2%), vomiting (8/14,57.1%), decreased appetite (6/14,42.8%), fatigue (4/14,28.5%), pruritus (3/14,21.4%) and ALT/AST increased (4/14,28.5%). Grade ≥3 neoadjuvant therapy related AEs were neutropenia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), anemia (n = 2). One patient discontinued GC plus tislelizumab due to AEs. Conclusions: Patients with clinically lymph node‐positive bladder cancer have significant pN0 after neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant tislelizumab plus gemcitabine/cisplatin was feasible and provided meaningful pathologic responses in lymph node‐positive bladder cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04570410.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Urothelial Cancer - Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04570410

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16599)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16599

Abstract #

e16599

Abstract Disclosures