The effects of social determinants of health on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors

null

Isabelle Franklin

Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA

Isabelle Franklin , Rebecca Gambatese , Theodore R. Levin , Quyen Ngo-Metzger , Gloria D Coronado

Organizations

Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR

Research Funding

Institutional Funding
Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine

Background: Colorectal cancer is the 3rd leading cause of cancer death in the United States yet has consistently lagged in screening rates compared to other cancers. While patient-reported barriers have been previously described, few studies have analyzed how patients’ social needs affect screening rates. Methods: This cross-sectional study includes 3974 Kaiser Permanente (KP) patients ages 50-75 years who completed the 2020 KP National Social Needs Survey. Survey respondents were from the seven KP regions of Southern California, Northern California, Colorado, Washington, Northwest, Georgia, and Hawaii. Five Social Needs categories were assessed: Financial Strain, Housing Instability, Transportation Issues, Social Isolation, and Food Insecurity. Being up to date on CRC screening was determined from patients’ KP electronic health records, defined as meeting HEDIS criteria for screening. Multivariate analyses compared the level of social need to the respondents’ completion of colorectal screening between the years of 2019-2021, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, diagnostic category group (DxCG), neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), and insurance type. Results: Among the 3974 survey respondents, 92.2% were up to date on their colorectal cancer screening. Not being up to date on CRC screening was significantly associated with having any social need and having severe needs in four of the five social need domains adjusted for sociodemographic and health status (Table). Patients were less likely to be screened if they had severe financial strain (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73), severe social isolation (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38-0.71), severe transportation issues (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18-0.61), and severe food insecurity (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62). No significant association between screening status and the domain of severe housing instability were found (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.52-1.06). Conclusions: Respondents with financial strain, social isolation, food insecurity, and transportation issues had lower odds of being up to date with colorectal cancer screening. Future efforts aimed to improve colorectal cancer screening rates should assess patients’ social needs and target ways to address these potential barriers to screening.

Odds of colorectal cancer screening by social needs.

ParameterAdjusted Odds Ratio195% CI
Severe Financial Strain (Yes vs No)0.540.400.73
Severe Social Isolation (Yes vs No)0.520.380.71
Severe Food Insecurity (Yes vs No)0.410.270.62
Severe Housing Instability (Yes vs No)0.740.521.06
Severe Transportation Issue (Yes vs No)0.330.180.61
Any Severe Social Need (Yes vs No)0.540.420.70

1 Receipt of colon cancer screening adjusted for age, neighborhood deprivation index, sex, DxCG risk score, race/ethnicity, primary spoken language, insurance type.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 6568)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.6568

Abstract #

6568

Poster Bd #

60

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

The Ohio State University Guardant Shield Colorectal Cancer Screening Project.

First Author: Peter Stanich

First Author: Kim Newcomer