Induction chemotherapy plus definitive chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Long-term results and exploratory analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors

null

Mian Xi

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Mian Xi , Baoqing Chen , Shi-Liang Liu , Yujia Zhu , Lei Zhao , Mengzhong Liu

Organizations

Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The previous results of our trial demonstrated that the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) failed to significantly improve response rate or 3-year survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report the long-term results and exploratory analyses to further evaluate the therapeutic value of IC in ESCC. Methods: This was a single-institution, open-label, randomized, phase II trial. Patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage II–IVA ESCC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive induction docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks for two cycles, followed by concurrent CRT, or CRT alone. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at 3 months after CRT. Second endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The relationship between tumor response to IC and long-term survival was analyzed as an exploratory, post-hoc analysis. Moreover, baseline tumor biopsies were evaluated by RNA-seq to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from IC. Results: Between May 2015 and September 2017, 110 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the IC+CRT group (n=55) or the CRT group (n=55). The overall response rate was 74.5% in the IC+CRT group versus 61.8% in the CRT group (P=0.15). At a median follow-up of 74.9 months, the 5-year OS rate was 31.8% in the IC+CRT group and 29.1% in the CRT group (P=0.68; HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.58–1.43). Similarly, no significant differences were identified in 5-year PFS between groups (30.5% vs. 25.5%, P=0.51; HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.34). Patients who responded to IC had significantly better survival than nonresponders. Six key genes were identified based on RNA-seq and gene expression comparison between responders and nonresponders after IC. Risk-score model was constructed by these key genes and then validated. Conclusions: Addition of induction docetaxel plus cisplatin before definitive CRT still failed to provide an obvious survival benefit in ESCC based on long-term follow-up. However, this strategy did result in a significantly improved survival in IC responders. Our results also revealed potential molecular biomarkers to predict who may benefit from IC. Clinical trial information: NCT02403531.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer - Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02403531

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 4061)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.4061

Abstract #

4061

Poster Bd #

382

Abstract Disclosures