Negative estrogen receptor expression assessed by 18F-FES PET in metastatic breast cancer with ER-positive primary tumor.

Authors

null

Biyun Wang

Department of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

Biyun Wang , Shuhui You , Yizhao Xie , Mengjing Ji , Zhongyi Yang

Organizations

Department of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, Department of Breast Cancer and Urological Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FES PET/CT) technique provides a convenient method to evaluate the overall estrogen receptor (ER) expression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. There are long debates on the characteristics and treatment strategy of patients with positive primary ER lesion but negative ER expression in metastatic disease. 18F-FES PET offers an opportunity to answer this question. Methods: This study enrolled MBC patients with ER-positive primary tumor who received 18F-FES PET/CT in our center. Descriptive statistics were used in clinicopathologic characteristics and compared with Chi square test or t test. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Results: 16.46% (52/314) patients with an ER-positive primary tumor had negative ER expression assessed by 18F-FES for MBC prior to receiving first-line systemic therapy. The rate of ER-negativity tested by 18F-FES was negatively co-related with levels of ER expression in early stage, with a positive to negative conversion in 2 of 3 (46.3%) ER-low (ie, ER 1%-9%) tumors, 7 of 10 (70.0%) ER-moderate (ie, ER 10%-49%) tumors, 16 of 114 (14.0%) ER-high (ie, ER 50%-95%) tumors, and 1 of 8 (12.5%) ER-very high (ie, ER > 95%) tumors (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy (83.33%, 40/48) was the most common treatment strategy afterward, among which capecitabine monotherapy (64.29%, 27/42) was a dominant alternative. PFS was significantly prolonged with capecitabine alone versus other chemotherapy (median PFS: 13.14 vs 6.21 months, p = 0.035). Conclusions: 18F-FES could identify negative conversion of ER in MBC which occurred frequently. Patients with lower ER expression in the primary lesion were more likely to have negative ER expression in the metastasis. In real-world clinical practice, chemotherapy was the primary choice by most physicians and capecitabine monotherapy had shown good efficacy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 1034)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1034

Abstract #

1034

Poster Bd #

255

Abstract Disclosures