Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
Amol Gupta , Ihab R. Kamel , Dan Laheru
Background: Gemcitabine-based and FOLFIRINOX (Oxaliplatin, irinotecan [IRI], 5-fluorouracil [5-FU], and leucovorin [LV]) regimens are common front-line therapies for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). Later-line options for these patients remain limited. Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU-LV has demonstrated a survival benefit in APC patients previously treated with gemcitabine-based treatment. However, the efficacy of nal-IRI plus 5-FU-LV in patients previously treated with conventional IRI containing regimens is controversial. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on consecutive APC patients treated at our institution between November 2016 to January 2023 who completed at least one cycle of nal-IRI plus 5-FU-LV and were previously treated with conventional IRI. Data regarding survival outcomes were retrieved. The association between the survival outcomes and the interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI was analyzed. Results: Forty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. One patient (2.4%) had a partial response (PR), and 12 patients (29.3%) had stable disease (SD) as their best response. The median overall duration of nal-IRI treatment was 2.2 (IQR: 1.4 – 5.2) months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 – 2.0) months, while the 6-month PFS rate was 24.4%. The median overall survival (mOS) was 5.9 (95% CI 3.5 – 8.2) months, and the 6-month OS rate was 48.7%. The median interval between the discontinuation of conventional IRI and starting nal-IRI was 6.5 (3.4 – 13.2) months. An interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI ≥6.5 months was significantly associated with prolonged OS (8.5 [95% CI 5.9 - 11.1] versus 4.3 [95% CI 2.7 – 5.9] months; p = 0.017), but comparable PFS (2.0 [95% CI 1.0 – 2.8] versus 1.7 [95% CI 1.5 – 1.9] months; p = 0.052). Conclusions: Patients previously treated with conventional IRI containing regimens appear to still benefit from nal-IRI plus 5-FU-LV. A longer interval between conventional IRI and nal-IRI was associated with better OS. A sequence strategy introducing a nal-IRI-based regimen at later lines may be feasible in selected APC patients previously treated with conventional IRI, given the limited therapeutic options. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Interval between IRI and nal-IRI, mos | Median (IQR) | 6.5 (3.4 – 13.2) |
---|---|---|
Duration of nal-IRI, mos | Median (IQR) | 2.2 (IQR: 1.4 – 5.2) |
Cumulative dose of nal-IRI (mg) | Median (IQR) | 600 (301 – 1225.5) |
Best response, n (%) | PR | 1 (2.4) |
SD | 12 (29.3) | |
PD | 28 (68.3) | |
mPFS (95% CI), mos | Median (IQR) | 1.9 (1.7 – 2.0) |
6-mo PFS, n (%) | 10 (24.4) | |
mOS (95% CI), mos | Median (IQR) | 5.9 (3.5 – 8.2) |
6-mo OS, n (%) | 20 (48.7) |
PD: progressive disease.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Sreenivasa R Chandana
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicolas Fraunhoffer
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kyunghye Bang
First Author: Rui Liu