Intralesional therapy, limb infusion/perfusion, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line therapy in surgically unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases.

Authors

null

Danielle K DePalo

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Danielle K DePalo , Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi , David W. Ollila , Tina J. Hieken , Matthew Stephen Block , Winan J. van Houdt , Michel W.J.M. Wouters , Nethanel Asher , Kristy Kummerow Broman , Zoey Duncan , Matilda Anderson , David E. Gyorki , John T. Vetto , Jane Yuet Ching Hui , Robyn P.M. Saw , Serigne N. Lo , Youngchul Kim , Alexander Christopher Jonathan Van Akkooi , Roger Olofsson Bagge , Jonathan S. Zager

Organizations

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Sheba Medical Center, TEL Hashomer, Israel, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, Peter MacCallum, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, Oregon Healthy Authority Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention Section, Portland, OR, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The Mater Hospital Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, Australia, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Surgery remains the gold standard for resectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM). Unresectable ITM is a heterogenous disease with multiple treatment (tx) options including systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), regional therapies such as isolated limb infusion or perfusion (ILI/P), and intratumoral therapies such as talimogene laherparepvec (IT). Until now, there has been no direct comparison of these first-line tx for unresectable ITM. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients (pts) with ITM treated first-line with IT, ILI/P, or ICI was performed at 11 institutions. Pts with unresectable ITM, synchronous nodal or distant metastatic disease were excluded. Results: 560 pts (54% women) were identified, 86 received IT, 353 received ILI/P, and 121 received ICI from 1990-2022. ICI pts were youngest, IT pts were oldest (p<0.001). Limb was the most common site of ITM. There was no difference in largest ITM size, but number of lesions (burden of disease (BOD)) was highest in ILI/P pts and lowest in IT pts (p=0.003). Toxicity (tox) requiring <90 days (p<0.001) or > 90 days (p=0.034) of pharmacologic tx as well as tox requiring hospitalization (p<0.001) was greatest in ICI pts. Lymphedema was more likely in ILI/P pts (p=0.016). Median follow-up was much longer for ILI/P pts at 8.0 yrs compared to 2.5 yrs for IT pts and 3.1 yrs for ICI pts. Overall response rate (ORR) was 82.2% in ILI/P pts, significantly higher than IT (72.1%, p=0.047) or ICI pts (63.6%, p<0.001). Overall survival was similar between modalities (p=0.167); however, ILI/P pts had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p<0.0001) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) (p=0.003). On multivariable analysis of MSS by number of ITM present, MSS remained worst if ILI/P was used for low BOD, ≤3 ITM (p=0.005), but no difference was seen between tx modalities for higher BOD, >3 ITM (p=0.211). Conclusions: ICI was used more often in younger pts with less BOD, IT in older pts with less BOD, and ILI/P in older pts with high BOD. Short and long-term tox was greater in ICI. ILI/P had the best ORR, but ICI and IT resulted in greater overall MSS. Multidisciplinary consideration of risks and benefits of each modality should guide ITM tx selection.

Patient and tumor characteristics, toxicity, and outcomes by treatment modality.

IT n= 86ILI/P n=353ICI n=121p-value
Age (yrs, median)746764p<0.001
Number of ITM (mean)4.212.67.1p=0.003
Tox Requiring <90 Days Pharmacologic Tx (%)18.020.444.1p<0.001
Tox Requiring >90 Days Pharmacologic Tx (%)0.012.716.9p=0.034
Tox Requiring Hospitalization (%)1.49.222.1p<0.001
ORR (%)72.182.263.6IT vs. ILI/P p=0.047 ILI/P vs. ICI p<0.001 ICI vs. IT p=0.231
Median Follow-Up (yrs)2.58.03.1-
Median PFS (yrs)2.10.71.2p<0.0001
MSS (cumulative incidence, events/total)13/85148/34715/106p=0.003

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 9574)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.9574

Abstract #

9574

Poster Bd #

337

Abstract Disclosures