Prognostic impact of depth of response (DpR) and early tumour shrinkage (ETS) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E mutated (mut) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving targeted therapy (TT) as second-line treatment.

Authors

null

Guglielmo Vetere

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa & Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy

Guglielmo Vetere , Marco Maria Germani , Maria Bensi , Carlotta Antoniotti , Sara Lonardi , Alessandro Passardi , Filippo Ghelardi , Maria Alessandra Calegari , Beatrice Borelli , Sara Santucci , Rossana Intini , Eleonora Cristarella , Mara Persano , Alberto Puccini , Daniele Lavacchi , Laura Noto , Clizia Zichi , Riccardo Giampieri , Massimiliano Salati , Chiara Cremolini

Organizations

Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa & Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy, Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli–IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy, Padua, Italy, Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy, Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy, Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, Oncology Unit, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy, Medical Oncology 1, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV–IRCCS, Padua, Italy, Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy, Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale San Martino, Genoa, Italy, Medical Oncology Unit,Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy, Medical Oncology, University Hospital Policlinico G. Rodolico-S. Marco, Catania, Italy, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy, Clinica Oncologica - Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Molecolari - Università Politecnica delle Marche & Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy, Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena Cancer Centre, Modena, Italy, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa & Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy, Italy

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Encorafenib and cetuximab (EC) is the standard of care for pre-treated patients (pts) with BRAF V600E mut mCRC. DpR and ETS previously showed a strong correlation with survival outcomes in mCRC pts receiving 1st-line therapy. We assessed these tumour dynamic response parameters and their association with clinical outcome in pts with BRAF V600E mut mCRC treated with TT in second-line. Methods: Patients treated in a real-life setting with EC or EC plus binimetinib (ECB) in 20 Italian centres were included. Pts with measurable disease and at least one available disease reassessment by CT scan were eligible. Pts experiencing disease progression as best response (i.e. primary resistant) were not evaluable for DpR and ETS. Associations between DpR and ETS and progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested by univariate and multivariate models. Results: 105 pts were included: 89 (85%) and 16 (15%) pts were treated with EC and ECB, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 5.2 and 10.3 mos, respectively. Twenty-nine pts (28%) were primary resistant, while 76 (72%) pts achieved disease control (51 [48%] and 25 [24%] pts had SD or CR/PR, respectively). Among baseline characteristics, the presence of peritoneal metastases was a predictor of primary resistance (p = 0.04). Among pts evaluable for response parameters (n = 76), median DpR was 15% and ETS occurred in 28 pts (37%). Mucinous histology was associated with a significantly lower magnitude of DpR (p = 0.005) and a lower rate of ETS (p = 0.002). A significant association between DpR and PFS was observed, both as a dichotomous (ie, ≥ or < median value) and continuous variable in univariate and multivariate analyses. Also RECIST response correlated with PFS in the two models (table). DpR was associated with OS in the univariate analyses, but this was not confirmed in the multivariate models (table). No correlation between ETS and survival, either as a dichotomous (ie, ≥ or < 20%) or a continuous variable, was observed. Conclusions: Having a DpR of at least 15% predicts longer PFS and OS in patients with BRAF V600E mut mCRC receiving TT as second-line treatment. An independent cohort of pts treated with second-line chemotherapy +/- antiangiogenic is under investigation as control group.

DpR ContinuousDpR ≥ 15%DpR < 15%RECIST CR+PRRECIST SD
PFS
HR (95% CI)
P

Adj HR (95% CI)
P

0.87* (0.77-0.96)
.006

0.88* (0.78-0.98)
.021

0.56 (0.34-0.93)
.017

0.55 (0.33-0.92)
.024

0.54 (0.33-0.88)
.017

0.52 (0.30-0.90)
.020
OS
HR (95% CI)
P

Adj HR (95% CI)
P

0.88* (0.76-0.99)
.038

0.93* (0.80-1.08)
.293

0.61 (0.34-1.07)
.075

0.78 (0.43-1.42)
.417

0.58 (0.33-1.04)
.079

0.70 (0.36-1.38)
.307

*for 10% increase.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 3568)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.3568

Abstract #

3568

Poster Bd #

268

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts