Defendor special: Interim analysis of TCHP with primary empegfilgrastim prophylaxis (long-acting G-CSF) for treatment outcomes in early HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors

null

Lyudmila Zhukova

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation

Lyudmila Zhukova , Tansylu Ibragimova , Inna Ganshina , Daria Filonenko , Irina Sorokina

Organizations

Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation, Russian Cancer Research Center N.N. Blokhin, Moscow, Russian Federation

Research Funding

Other Government Agency
Moscow Government for the evaluation of a scientific and practical project in the field of medicine No. 0903-2/22

Background: TCHP is the standard regimen for neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) of HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+ eBC) and requires primary G-CSF prophylaxis (PP). Pathological complete response (pCR) after NAT reflects better pts outcomes. Long-acting G-CSF presents more balanced neutrophils (NEU) count vs short G-CSF. Preclinical data show tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) as anti-tumor effector cells in eBC. There are limited data on the clinical benefit of TCHP in the subset of patients with HER2 amplification by ISH in the low-moderate of HER2 protein expression. This sub-group analysis of multicenter prospective study was designed to evaluate the pCR after TCHP with PP by empegfilgrastim (E) or filgrastim (F) in pts with HER2+ eBC. Methods: HER2+ eBC pts (n=199) with II-III stages are getting NAТ: 6 docetaxel/ carboplatin/ trastuzumab + pertuzumab + empegfilrastim/ filgrastim (TCHP+E/F). Short G-CSF (F) uses according to routine clinical practice, long-acting G-CSF (E) - 24h after each NAT cycle. This descriptive analyse were performed for pts who completed the whole NAT regimen. The study endpoints: pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) in intention-to-treat (ITT) population and according to HER2 status: 3+ vs 2+ ISH positive (+). ClinicalTrials.gov No NCT04905329. Results: At the data cut-off (01’2023) 199 pts with HER2+ BC completed planned NAT and surgery (71 pts – TCHP+E; 128 pts – TCHP+F). pCR rate according to HER2 status and in ITT population in 2 G-CSF groups is presented. In TCHP+E group pCR rate exceeds KRISTINE trial data despite a more enriched pts’ population with poor prognosis (34% pts with IIIB - IIIC vs 17% pts in KRISTINE trial) while TCHP+F showed comparable results with historical control. The superior pCR rate under PP with E was also observed in HER2 (3+) pts sub-group vs PP with F. However, in HER2 (2+ ISH+) the results are similar in 2 G-CSF groups. The mature data are awaited. Conclusions: TCHP+E shows superior pCR rate vs TCHP+F in the ITT and HER2 (3+) population. The obtained results affirm data of preclinical research on the ability of G-CSF to switch tumor immunity from “cold” to “hot” in the eBC. We assumed that balanced NEU count under long-acting G-CSF stimulation enhances TANs infiltration is increasing therapy efficiency. In HER2 (2+ ISH+) population pCR results were comparable in 2 G-CSF groups. Discrepancies between gene amplification and protein overexpression resulted in declined amount of HER2-inhibitors-HER2 receptor active complexes. It can be TANs failure to kill anti-HER2-antibody-opsonized cancer cells by a trogoptosis. Our hypothesis requires further confirmation with translational research. Clinical trial information: NCT04905329.

pCR rate according to HER2 status and in ITT population in 2 G-CSF groups.

pCR, % (n)TCHP+E (n=71)TCHP+F (n=128)
HER2 (3+)79% (49/62)64% (66/103)
HER2 (2+ ISH+)22% (2/9)25% (4/25)
ITT72% (51)55% (67)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Neoadjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04905329

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e12586)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e12586

Abstract #

e12586

Abstract Disclosures