Measuring variation in the quality of systemic anti-cancer therapy delivery across hospitals: A national population-based evaluation.

Authors

null

Jemma Megan Boyle

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

Jemma Megan Boyle , Jan van der Meulen , Angela Kuryba , Thomas E Cowling , Christopher M. Booth , Nicola S Fearnhead , Michael Braun , Kate Walker , Ajay Kumar Aggarwal

Organizations

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, Clinical Effectiveness Unit, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: To date, there has been little systematic assessment of the quality of care associated with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) delivery across national healthcare systems. We evaluated hospital-level toxicity rates during SACT treatment as a means of identifying variation in care quality. Methods: All colorectal cancer patients receiving SACT within 106 English National Health Service hospitals between 2016 and 2019 were included. Severe acute toxicity rates were derived from hospital administrative data using a validated coding framework. Variation in hospital-level toxicity rates was assessed separately in the adjuvant and metastatic settings. Toxicity rates were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, performance status, tumour site, and TNM staging. Results: Of the 8,173 patients receiving SACT in the adjuvant setting, 2,074 (25%) had a toxicity with adjusted hospital-level rates varying from 11% to 49%. Of the 7,683 patients receiving SACT in the metastatic setting, 3,625 (47%) had a toxicity with adjusted hospital-level rates varying from 25% to 67%. Compared to the national mean toxicity rate in the adjuvant cohort, six hospitals were more than 2 standard deviations (2SD) above, and four hospitals were more than 2SD below. Similarly, in the metastatic cohort, six hospitals were more than 2SD above, and seven hospitals were more than 2SD below the national mean toxicity rate. Conclusions: There is substantial variation in hospital-level severe acute toxicity rates in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings, despite comprehensive risk-adjustment. Ongoing reporting of this performance indicator can be used to focus further investigation of toxicity rates and stimulate quality improvement initiatives to enhance care.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Real-World Data/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 6593)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.6593

Abstract #

6593

Poster Bd #

85

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Corbin J. Eule

First Author: Praful Ravi

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Real-world experience with liposomal doxorubicin in metastatic and locally advanced sarcoma.

First Author: Allen Hodge