DNA methylation patterns between tissue and blood samples in ovarian cancer.

Authors

null

Hao Wen

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China

Hao Wen , Zheng Feng , Huijuan Ge , Yanan Wang , Jingshu Wang , Xiaoran Sun , Bo Yang , Chenlian Quan , Xiaoyan Zhou , Xiaohua Wu

Organizations

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, Burning Rock Bioengineering Ltd, Guangzhou, China, Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Altered DNA methylation pattern, with functional consequences in the activity of key carcinogenic pathways, has been shown to be involved in the carcinogenesis of ovarian cancer. Tumor DNA is released into the blood via apoptosis or necrosis. Therefore, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation alteration can also be detected in blood, which has shown promising performance in ovarian cancer early detection and prognostication. However, the difference of DNA methylation patterns between the tissue and blood samples of ovarian cancer is still unclear. Methods: PERCEIVE-I study (NCT04903665) is a prospective study aimed at the early detection of gynecological malignancies. Blood and paired tissue samples from this study were collected at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. Blood samples from age-matched non-cancer controls were also collected. All the blood and paired tissue samples were sequenced by a target methylation panel covering ~490,000 CpG sites. Finally, The ovarian cancer methylation patterns were analyzed based on 11 paired cancer-adjacent tissue samples and 170 blood samples (cancer, n=48; non-cancer control, n=122). Results: In total, 7,225 differentially methylated blocks (DMBs) were identified by comparing cancer and adjacent tissues, with 5,093 hypomethylated and 2,132 hypermethylated. By contrast, there were 5,853 hypomethylated and 8,685 hypermethylated DMBs in cancer blood samples compared with non-cancer controls. Among the 7,225 DMBs in tissues, 3,962 (54.8%) blocks were also observed to be altered in blood samples, including 2,354 hypomethylated blocks and 1,114 hypermethylated blocks. GO analysis revealed that these hypomethylated blocks were mainly associated with functions such as regulation of synaptic membrane and DNA-binding transcription activator activity, while the hypermethylated blocks were mainly enriched in the pattern specification process, transcription factor complex, and the DNA-binding transcription activator activity. The alteration of the above 3,962 DMBs in tissue were highly correlated with the alteration in blood (correlation coefficient of 0.71, 0.50, 0.73 and 0.73 for stage I-IV, respectively). Furthermore, in patients carrying germline BRCA1/2 mutations (n=11), most of the above DMBs were not significantly different from those without germline BRCA1/2 mutations (n=37). Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that blood DNA methylation alteration was highly consistent with tissue DNA methylation alteration in ovarian cancer, indicating the sustained release of DNA methylation signals from the primary cancer sites. These results suggest that cfDNA methylation can be used as reliable biomarkers for the early detection of ovarian cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04903665.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04903665

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 5558)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5558

Abstract #

5558

Poster Bd #

253

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Natalya N. Timoshkina

First Author: Deepak Bhamidipati