Efficacy and safety of second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors

null

Xiaoting Ma

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, China

Xiaoting Ma , Lin Yang

Organizations

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, China

Research Funding

Other
Beijing CSCO Clinical Oncology Research Foundation (Y-HH202102-0308)

Background: To evaluate the difference of curative effect between different treatment regimens in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who have previously received fluorouracil based first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We searched PubMed, PMC and EMBASE databases for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The number of people who reached the objective response rate (ORR) and the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted. R (version 4.0.5) and R Studio were used to conduct meta-analysis of relevant data based on the Bayesian framework. Gemtc software package facilitates statistical analysis. To provide a ranking for each treatment regimen, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated. Survival analysis was conducted based on WinBUGS 14. STATA17.0 was used to draw the network diagram and funnel plot. Results: A total of 17 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, and a total of 15 treatment regimens were used in the second-line treatment of AGC. There was no publication bias or other bias in the studies. Ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel weekly regimens have obvious advantages in efficacy and safety. Among them, ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel (83.6%) has great advantages in ORR, while the probability of anemia (36.6%) and anorexia (22.7%) is low, and the probability of leucopenia (66.6%) is high. However, the ORR of nab-paclitaxel weekly regimen (71.4%) is only second to that of ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel, and the probability of anemia (46.3%) and anorexia (44%) is also low, and the probability of leucopenia (53.8%) is high. In terms of OS and PFS, ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel has the best effect according to the probabilistic settlement table. Pembrolizumab and 5-Fu have poor therapeutic effects in terms of PFS. Conclusions: Ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel can significantly improve the survival outcome of patients with AGC. The effect of ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel is significantly better than that of paclitaxel, and the effect of nab-paclitaxel is only second to that of ramucirumab combined with paclitaxel. The safety of multi-drug combination should also be carefully considered. These findings may help clinicians better choose the second-line treatment strategy for patients with AGC.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Esophageal or Gastric Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16018)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16018

Abstract #

e16018

Abstract Disclosures