Patterns of care delivery and outcomes in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab.

Authors

null

Tarek Haykal

Duke University, Durham, NC

Tarek Haykal , Michelle Ferreira , Melissa Lowe , Brent Allen Hanks , Peter E. Fecci , John P. Kirkpatrick , Eugene John Vaios , Zach Reitman , April K.S. Salama

Organizations

Duke University, Durham, NC, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, Duke Medical Center, Durham, NC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Patients (Pts) with metastatic melanoma presenting with brain metastases (MBM) have a high morbidity and mortality risk. The combination of ipilimumab/nivolumab (I/N) has demonstrated high intracranial response rates in selected, asymptomatic pts, suggesting there is a subset of pts who may be able to forgo or delay intracranial therapies. There is currently limited real world data on how many pts with MBM are successfully treated with this approach. We sought to explore our clinical experience at Duke University with combination immune checkpoint inhibitors for pts with MBM. Methods: An electronic database search was conducted for all metastatic melanoma pts treated with PD-1 therapies between 2015 and 2021. Pts treated with combination ICIs for brain metastases were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were need for local therapies (radiation (RT): stereotactic radiosurgery or whole brain radiation therapy or craniotomy), and immune related adverse events (irAEs). Results: Between 2015 and 2021, 66 pts with MBM received I/N, with a median follow-up of 30.4 months. Median age was 68, 60.6% were male and 61% had a BRAF mutation. 38 pts were asymptomatic. Of the 28 symptomatic patients 61% were on corticosteroids at the time of I/N initiation. 56% of pts received local therapy prior to start of I/N, 17% during and 18% after discontinuing I/N. 53% of pts were initiated on I/N as first line systemic therapy for MBM. 56% of patients had to discontinue I/N after one cycle because of high-grade irAEs. 13.8% of patients that received RT to the brain developed radionecrosis. Median OS was 25.6 months in the overall cohort, with a 1 year OS of 63%. There was a trend towards a higher risk of death for symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients HR:1.96 [95% CI: 0.96, 3.97; P:0.06]. Of the 38 asymptomatic patients, only 6 patients did not receive local therapies with either RT or craniotomy. Two of these patients died from melanoma progression, one from intra-cranial progression, the other from both intra-cranial and extra-cranial progression, and 4 remain alive without evidence of progression. Conclusions: The majority of pts with MBM are ultimately treated with multimodality therapy. Advances in systemic therapies have provided meaningful clinical benefit that could allow a limited number of asymptomatic patients to forgo local therapy, but currently few pts are treated in this manner.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e21510)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e21510

Abstract #

e21510

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts