Development and validation of a clinical prognostic model for BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer patients based on pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site.

Authors

null

Kai Ou

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China

Kai Ou , Lin Yang

Organizations

National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, Beijing, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutations may be a heterogeneous population with different outcomes. Clinical and molecular pathologic factors related to the prognosis of colorectal cancer need further investigation. Methods: The clinical and pathological information of 206 patients with BRAF V600E mutated colorectal cancer diagnosed in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College from 2014 to 2021 was retrospectively collected. LASSO regression, COX regression and Nomograms were used to develop clinical prognostic models. The differentiation was measured by C-statistic and decision curve analysis, and the predicted variability was evaluated by calibration curve. The prognostic model was externally validated with validation set data from 164 patients pooled from 5 studies. Results: Our clinical prognostic model included three variables: pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site. In internal validation, the model had a concordant index of 0.785 (95%CI [0.732-0.839]) and a concordant index of 0.754 (95%CI [0.698-0.810]) using pathological staging. External validation confirmed the robustness of the model with a consistency index of 0.670 (95%CI ([0.617-0.724]) and a consistency index of 0.584 (95%CI [0.546-0.622]) using pathological staging. The application of decision curve analysis in both the training set and the validation set showed that our three-factor clinical prediction model was superior to the pathological staging. The calibration graph drawn based on the prediction and the actual situation is close to the 45° diagonal. Conclusions: By adding microsatellite status and primary tumor site on the basis of pathological stage, we improved the discriminability and prediction accuracy of the model, and successfully established a prognosis model for patients with BRAF V600E mutation of colorectal cancer.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Other Colorectal and Anal Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e15660)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e15660

Abstract #

e15660

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Real-world analyses of BRAF alterations in patients with non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers.

First Author: Amit Mahipal

First Author: Kelsey Klute

First Author: Parvathi Myer

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Frequency of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer in an Argentinian population.

First Author: Agustín Barbier