Patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia with hydromorphone versus oral oxycodone for opioid titration of cancer pain: A prospective multicenter randomized trial.

Authors

null

Xiaoguang Xiao

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Xiaoguang Xiao , Qian Chu , Yuan Chen

Organizations

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Studies have shown that oral oxycodone sustained-release (SR) tablets can be used for opioid titration. The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines for adult cancer pain recommend opioid titration through the parenteral route, usually the intravenous or subcutaneous route. Patient-controlled subcutaneous analgesia (PCSA) with hydromorphone needs further evaluation for opioid titration. This prospective multicenter study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of hydromorphone PCSA with oral oxycodone SR tablets for opioid titration of cancer pain. Methods:Eligible patients with cancer pain were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the PCSA group or the oxycontin group for dose titration. Different titration methods were given in both groups depending on whether the patient had an opioid tolerance. The primary endpoint of this study was time to successful titration (TST). Results: A total of 256 patients completed this study. The PCSA group had a significantly lower TST compared with the oxycontin group (median [95% confidence interval (CI)], 5.5 [95%CI: 2.5-11.5] hours vs. 16.0 [95%CI: 11.5-22.5] hours; p< 0.001). PCSA reduced the frequency of breakthrough pain (Btp), especially in patients with opioid tolerance. The number of Btp was 121±28 times and 186±31 times in the PCSA and oxycontin groups, respectively (p< 0.001). The 12-hour numeric rating scale (NRS) score was significantly lower in the PCSA group than that in the oxycontin group (median [95%CI], 2.5 [95%CI: 1.4-2.9] vs. 4.4[95%CI: 3.2-5.8]) (p< 0.001). Similar equivalent morphine consumption and significantly improved quality of life were observed in the two groups. No between-group difference in the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects was observed. Conclusions: Compared with oral oxycodone SR tablet, the use of PCSA with hydromorphone achieved faster pain relief and a shorter titration duration for patients with cancer pain without increasing adverse events. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000037845.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ChiCTR2000037845

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 12124)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.12124

Abstract #

12124

Poster Bd #

492

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Christopher John Coyne

First Author: Desiree Rachel Azizoddin

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

The impact of music therapy on opioid use in cancer survivors with chronic pain.

First Author: Joke Bradt