First phase 3 results from CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-cel versus standard of care (PVd or DPd) in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors

null

Binod Dhakal

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

Binod Dhakal , Kwee Yong , Simon J. Harrison , Maria-Victoria Mateos , Niels W.C.J. van de Donk , Surbhi Sidana , Rakesh Popat , Nikoletta Lendvai , Carolina Lonardi , Ana Slaughter , Jordan Mark Schecter , Katherine Li , Enrique Zudaire , Ying Chen , Jane Gilbert , Lida Bubuteishvili-Pacaud , Nitin Patel , Jesús San-Miguel , Hermann Einsele , Philippe Moreau

Organizations

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, University Hospital of Salamanca/IBSAL/CIC/CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, Janssen, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Cilag GmbH International, Zug, Switzerland, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, Janssen Research & Development, Shanghai, China, Janssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, United Kingdom, Legend Biotech USA Inc., Somerset, NJ, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Würzburg, Germany, Hematology Clinic, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Legend Biotech USA Inc

Background: CARTITUDE-4 is a global, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (NCT04181827) of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a dual-binding, BCMA-targeting CAR-T cell therapy, vs standard of care (SOC; pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone [PVd] or daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone [DPd]) in lenalidomide (len)-refractory patients (pts). Methods: Eligible pts had 1–3 prior lines of therapy (LOT), including PI and IMiD, and were len-refractory. After apheresis, pts randomized to cilta-cel received PVd or DPd (physician’s choice) bridging therapy, then 1 cilta-cel infusion 5–7 days after lymphodepletion. In the SOC arm, pts received PVd or DPd until progression. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat (randomized) population. Results: 419 pts were randomized (cilta-cel, n=208; SOC, n=211 [PVd, n=28; DPd, n=183]). 176 pts received cilta-cel as study treatment (tx), 20 more received it after PD on bridging therapy, and 208 received SOC. There were no manufacturing failures. Baseline characteristics were balanced (cilta-cel vs SOC: 59% vs 63% cytogenetic high risk [including gain/amp 1q]; 50% vs 46% PI refractory; 24% vs 22% anti-CD38 refractory; 33% vs 32% had 1 prior LOT). Median dose was 0.71×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg. At Nov 1, 2022, data cut-off, median follow-up was 16 mo (range, 0.1–27). Primary endpoint was met; cilta-cel reduced risk of progression/death by 74% (HR=0.26; P<0.0001). Cilta-cel vs SOC significantly improved ORR, rate of ≥CR, and overall MRD negativity rate (Table), with a positive trend in OS (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.5–1.2). 97% and 94% of pts treated in the cilta-cel or SOC arms, respectively, had grade (gr) 3/4 AEs, including infections (27% vs 25%) and cytopenias (94% vs 86%). In the cilta-cel and SOC arms, respectively, 39 and 46 pts died (14 and 30 due to PD). In pts who received cilta-cel as study tx (n=176), 76% had CRS (1% gr 3; no gr 4/5) and 5% had ICANS (all gr 1/2). 1 pt had a gr 1 movement/neurocognitive TEAE. Conclusions: A single cilta-cel infusion significantly improved PFS vs SOC in len-refractory pts with 1–3 prior LOT, with a favorable benefit/risk profile across pt populations. The 74% reduction in progression/death and high rates of CR and MRD negativity highlight the potential for cilta-cel to become a key therapy for pts with MM after first relapse. Clinical trial information: NCT04181827.

Cilta-cel vs SOC outcomes (ITT).

Cilta-cel
(n=208)
SOC
(n=211)
HRaOdds ratio
Median PFS, mo (95% CI)NE (23–NE)12 (10–14)0.26 (0.18–0.38)
(P<0.0001)
12-mo PFS, % (95% CI)76 (69–81)49 (42–55)
ORR, n (%)b176 (85)142 (67)3 (P<0.0001)
≥CRb 152 (73)46 (22)10 (P<0.0001)
10-5 MRD negative,c n (%)126 (61)33 (16)9 (P<0.0001)

aPer computerized algorithm by constant piecewise weighted log-rank test. bIn 176 pts who received cilta-cel as study tx: ORR, 175 (99%); ≥CR, 152 (86%). cFor MRD-evaluable pts: cilta-cel, 88% (126/144); SOC, 33% (33/101).

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Clinical Science Symposium

Session Title

Moving Cellular Therapy Into Earlier Lines of Treatment in Hematologic Malignancies: Latest Efficacy Data and The Need to Improve Access

Track

Special Sessions

Sub Track

Cell Therapy, Bispecific Antibodies, and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Plasma Cell Disorders

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04181827

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 17; abstr LBA106)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA106

Abstract #

LBA106

Abstract Disclosures