Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN
Thomas Stricker , Neha Jain , Elaine Yu , Esprit Ma , Robert Schuldt , Rongrong Wang , Jesse Sussell , Sarika Ogale , Tania Szado , Richard Price , Victor T. G. Lin , Dennis Slater , Daniel A. Vaena , Harry Staszewski , Bruno Fang , Lasika Seneviratne , Edward Arrowsmith , Davey B. Daniel
Background: Recent real-world studies observed that some aNSCLC pts with ADO initiated non-targeted therapy (non-TT) before biomarker test results became available. This study assesses the clinical impact of the timing of first line (1L) TT in aNSCLC pts with ADO. Methods: In a retrospective analysis of the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database, pts aged ≥18 years, diagnosed (Dx) with aNSCLC between 1/1/2015-10/18/2022, had ADO (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, RET, MET, ROS-1, or NTRK) based on biomarker testing ≤ 90 days of advanced Dx, and received 1L treatment (tx) were included. Cohorts were defined by tx patterns after test result: Cohort 1 received 1L TT ≤ 42 days; Cohort 2 initiated 1L non-TT before or after testing but switched to TT ≤ 42 days; Cohort 3 initiated non-TT before or after testing and did not switch to TT ≤ 42 days. Pts were followed from test results + 42 days until 11/30/2022 or death, whichever earliest. Multivariate Cox regression evaluated real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) between cohorts. Results: A total of 5156 aNSCLC pts with ADO were included: 79% were treated in the community setting and 56% received NGS testing. Most common ADO were EGFR and ALK for both Cohort 1 (78% and 13%) and Cohort 2 (67% and 24%); EGFR (39%) and BRAF (35%) for Cohort 3. Cohort 3 included more rare mutations (MET, NTRK, RET). Statistically significant differences were observed in gender, race/ethnicity, practice type, and area-level socioeconomic status across all cohorts. There was no significant difference in outcomes observed between Cohort 2 and 1, but significantly inferior outcomes in Cohort 3 vs 1. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated better outcomes with upfront 1L TT vs non-TT in aNSCLC pts with ADO. The comparable outcomes between pts who received 1L TT after test result and pts who switched to TT ≤ 42 days of test result available underscore the importance of timely tx decisions based on ADO detection in lieu of tx-switch at progression. Opportunities remain to improve utilization of NGS to identify all ADO upfront to inform the appropriate 1L TT when indicated.
Median (95% CI) rwPFS, months | rwPFS adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) | Median (95% CI) OS, months | OS adjusted HRs | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cohort 1, n=3005 (reference group) | 10 (10,11) | - | 28 (27,29) | - |
Cohort 2, n=162 | 13 (9,14) | 0.92, p=0.374 | 26 (21,38) | 0.96, p=0.731 |
Cohort 3, n=1989 | 6 (6,7) | 1.18, p<0.001 | 21 (19,24) | 1.12, p=0.018 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Mo Yang
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Anne Jacobson
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Mo Yang
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Simon Blanc