Cost-effectiveness analysis of seven treatment regimens in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): A public payer perspective using network meta-analysis.

Authors

Manish Kohli

Manish Kohli

Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Manish Kohli , Maura Dougherty , Zachary Cutshall , Rylee Beckstead , Rhea Kohli , Benjamin Haaland , Richard Nelson , Minkyoung Yoo

Organizations

Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt LAKE Cty, UT, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Recently several new treatment regimens have been approved for treating mHSPC, building on the previous standard of care using androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. These include docetaxel+ADT (DA), Abiraterone Acetate+Prednisone+ADT (AAP), Apalutamide+ADT (AAT), Enzalutamide+ADT (ET), Darolutamide+Docetaxel+ADT (DAD) and Abiraterone+Prednisone+ADT+Docetaxel (AAD). There are no current predictive biomarkers for choosing any specific regimen. The goal of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of these new treatments from the US public sector perspective with a lifetime horizon. Methods: We developed a partitioned survival model in which mHSPC patients transitioned between three health states (progression free, progressive disease to castrate resistance state, and death) at monthly intervals based on Weibull survival model estimated from published Kaplan-Meier curves using a network meta-analysis. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of seven clinical trials included 7,208 patients. The effectiveness outcome in our model was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with utility values obtained from published literature. Costs in our model included those associated with treatment regimens and subsequent therapies, terminal care, and for managing grade 3-4 drug related adverse events, and were obtained from the Federal Supply Schedule and published literature. Results: Average lifetime costs ranged from $154,139 (AAP) to $770,848 (DAD) and mean QALYs ranged from 3.33 (ADT) to 5.08 (ET). All treatment strategies other than AAP and ET were eliminated due to dominance. Compared to AAP, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ET was $484,943/QALY. Results from our analysis including all regimens are shown. Conclusions: Our simulation model found that ET in mHSPC state yielded the most QALYs and would be the most cost-effective option with a WTP threshold as high as $500,000/QALY. However, for a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY, AAP was the most cost-effective treatment strategy.

Results from cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment regimens for mHSPC.

TreatmentCost EffectivenessICER
(2021$)(QALYs)($/QALY)
Abiraterone Acetate-Prednisone plus ADT (AAP)$154,1394.17-
Enzalutamide plus ADT (ET)$598,1565.08$484,943
ADT alone (ADT)$155,1463.33Dominated
Docetaxel plus ADT (DA)$218,8744.02Dominated
Enzalutamide+Docetaxel plus ADT (EAD)$503,2554.16Dominated
Aplalutamide plus ADT (AAT)$749,6305.01Dominated
Darolutamide+Docetaxel plus ADT (DAD)$770,8484.85Dominated

ADT: androgen deprivation therapy, QALY: quality-adjusted life-year, ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3% to reflect present value; All costs were in 2021 US dollars.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Other

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 268)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.268

Abstract #

268

Poster Bd #

K4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts