Outcomes Database to Prospectively Assess the Changing Therapy Landscape in Renal Cell Carcinoma (ODYSSEY RCC).

Authors

null

Michael Roger Harrison

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC

Michael Roger Harrison , Nrupen Anjan Bhavsar , Yasser Ged , Ajjai Shivaram Alva , Yousef Zakharia , Risa Liang Wong , Brian Addis Costello , Benjamin L. Maughan , Paul Monk III, Shreya Sinha , Deepak Kilari , Sarah Jabusch , Tian Zhang , Charles D. Scales Jr., Daniel J. George , Elizabeth Marie Wulff-Burchfield

Organizations

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, Duke University, Durham, NC, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, University of Michigan Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Hunstman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James Cancer Hospital & Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, Geisinger Clinic - Geisinger Wyoming Valley Medical Center, Henry Cancer Center, Wilkes Barre, PA, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, Duke Clinical Research Insitute, Durham, NC, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Division of Urology, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, University of Kansas Medical Center Department of Internal Medicine, Westwood, KS

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Merck, Pfizer, Exelixis, Bristol Myers-Squibb

Background: The landscape for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has changed dramatically over the past 7 years with the approvals of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune-oncology (IO) agents alone or in combination for untreated mRCC. However, multiple knowledge gaps remain. While active surveillance remains an option for selected pts, prospective evidence on selection of and outcomes for pts is limited. Recent phase III trials all used a common comparator, sunitinib, so no comparative effectiveness data on the new IO-based regimens exists. There are also no routinely used predictive biomarkers in mRCC pt management. Therefore, a better understanding of the biologic determinants associated with cancer heterogeneity and clinical outcomes through blood, tumor, and radiographic based assessments is needed. Importantly, longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life (QOL) and symptom burden of patients with mRCC initiated on new IO–based regimens outside of an interventional clinical trial are poorly understood. Pt reported outcomes (PRO) are rarely captured in a systematic manner. Addressing the evidence gap for how real world pts symptomatically change with treatment combinations and sequences over time is a pressing unmet need. Methods: This is a prospective, observational cohort, phase IV study of 800 mRCC pts in the US. Pts must: be age ≥19 at informed consent; have a diagnosis of mRCC (any histology) with no prior systemic therapy for mRCC (surgery and radiation therapy, prior neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy for non-mRCC, and pts currently not on systemic therapy and being observed are all permitted); and be able to comply with completion of PROs. Those being treated for active malignancies other than mRCC or not intending to undergo follow up care at a study site within PCORnet are excluded. Pts will undergo consent and baseline assessments, including research blood collection and processing, by the study site team. A novel aspect of this study is the use of PCORnet and Medicare data to minimize data collection burden on sites. PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network, is a network of networks that curates EHR data from multiple health systems using a common data model. This allows subsequent follow up to be centrally coordinated by the coordinating center. PRO will be collected at baseline (pre-treatment), every 3 mos for 2 yrs, and then every 6 mos until end of follow up (minimum 18 mos follow-up; maximum 36 mos follow-up). The primary objective is to determine distinct patterns of change in QOL and symptom burden of mRCC pts receiving therapy. Secondary objectives include quantifying the time to treatment discontinuation of pts, identifying patterns of clinical management in the real world setting of mRCC pts on various treatment regimens, and evaluating overall survival of mRCC pts. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04919122 Clinical trial information: NCT04919122.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Trials in Progress Poster Session

Session Title

Trials in Progress Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04919122

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr TPS739)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.TPS739

Abstract #

TPS739

Poster Bd #

M17

Abstract Disclosures