Patient experiences with tissue-based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer.

Authors

null

Michael Leapman

Yale University, New Haven, CT

Michael Leapman , Ryan Andrew Sutherland , Cary Philip Gross , Xiaomei Ma , Farah Jeong , Tyler M Seibert , Matthew R. Cooperberg , William Catalona , Stacy Loeb , Dena Schulman-Green

Organizations

Yale University, New Haven, CT, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, Yale Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy and Effectiveness Research Center, New Haven, CT, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY, New York University, New York, NY

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Tissue-based gene expression (genomic) tests improve estimates of prostate cancer aggressiveness and are increasingly used for patients considering or engaged in active surveillance; however, little is known about patient experiences with genomic testing and its role in decision-making for active surveillance. Methods: We performed a qualitative descriptive study consisting of in-depth, semi-structured interviews of patients with low- or favorable-intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. The interview guide focused on experiences with biopsy-based genomic testing during their decision-making for prostate cancer management. We used purposive sampling to include patients who received genomic testing as part of routine clinical care and we over-sampled Black and Latino men. We continued interviews until thematic saturation was reached, iteratively created a code key and used conventional content data analysis. Results: The mean age was 68 years (range 51-79; n=20). At initial biopsy, 17 (85%) had a Gleason grade group 1, and 3 (15%) had a grade group 2 tumor. Fourteen (70%) participants identified their race/ethnicity as White, 5 (25%) as Black, and 2 (10%) as Latino. The decision to undergo genomic testing was driven by both participants and physicians’ recommendations; however, some participants were unaware that testing had occurred. Overall, participants understood the role of genomic testing in estimating their prostate cancer risk, and the test results increased their confidence in the decision for active surveillance. However, participants did not understand the difference between tissue-based gene expression tests and germline genetic tests, and commonly believed that tissue-based tests measured hereditary cancer risk. While some participants expressed satisfaction with the explanations provided by their physicians, others felt that communication was inaccessible and lacked sufficient detail. Conclusions: Patients interact with and are influenced by the results of biopsy-based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer, however testing may increase informational needs. Our findings indicate areas for improvement in patient counseling that can be used to increase patient knowledge and comfort with genomic testing.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 333)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.333

Abstract #

333

Poster Bd #

L11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nita Mukand

First Author: Michael Thomas Schweizer

First Author: Lauren Lenz