Safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of TAR-200 in patients with intermediate risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A phase 1 study.

Authors

null

F. Johannes P. van Valenberg

Radboudumc, Department of Urology, Nijmegen, Netherlands

F. Johannes P. van Valenberg , Toine van der Heijden , Christopher Cutie , Sumeet Kaur Bhanvadia , Kirk A. Keegan , Shalaka Hampras , Hussein Sweiti , John Maffeo , Shu Jin , Albert Chau , Don Reynolds , Crysti Iarossi , April Kelley , Xiang Li , Katherine Stromberg , Michiel Sedelaar , Jessica Steenbruggen , Diederik Meindert Somford , Alfred Alfred Witjes

Organizations

Radboudumc, Department of Urology, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Janssen Research & Development, Lexington, MA, Janssen Research & Development, Raritan, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, Datacision Limited, London, United Kingdom, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Urology, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Janssen Research & Development

Background: TAR-200 is a novel intravesical drug delivery system designed to provide a continuous, slow release of gemcitabine within the bladder. Prolonged gemcitabine exposure over days, instead of hours, such as with current standard intravesical installations, may achieve more efficient and effective tumor response. We report on the safety and tolerability of TAR-200 in patients with non-muscle–invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods: In this phase 1b, open-label, prospective study, patients with a papillary recurrence after prior histologically proven, intermediate risk (IR)-NMIBC received two 1-week TAR-200 dosing cycles over a 4- to 6-week period. The study used a marker lesion/ablation design. Cystoscopy was performed to assess for recurrent papillary disease and for complete transurethral resection of the residual bladder tumor. The primary outcome was safety of TAR-200. Secondary outcomes were tolerability, pharmacokinetics, preliminary efficacy, and immunohistochemistry. Results: In total, 12 patients received TAR-200 treatment. Insertion and removal of TAR-200 was uneventful. No TAR-200-related serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. Four patients had no TAR-200-associated AEs; the remainder had varying degrees of AEs (all grade ≤2 [CTCAEv4.0]), mainly consisting of low-grade urinary urgency, urinary frequency, and dysuria, with no delay in the treatment schedule. Two patients refused a second dosing cycle due to urinary urgency and frequency. Plasma gemcitabine concentrations remained below the lower limit of detection. Five of 12 patients (42%) had complete response (CR); of these, 4 had a pathologic CR and 1 had CR based on visual assessment (with no biopsy available for pathologic assessment). Conclusions: In this small, phase 1 series, TAR-200 appears to be safe and well tolerated in patients with IR-NMIBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02720367.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Prostate Cancer and Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma,Prostate Cancer - Advanced

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02720367

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 505)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.505

Abstract #

505

Poster Bd #

K9

Abstract Disclosures