Jawaharlal Institute of Post-Graduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India;
Biswajit Dubashi , Charles L , Yadav Nisha , Rajesh Nachiappa Ganesh , Vikram Kate , Prasanth Penumadu , Sandhiya Selvarajan , Kalayarasan Raja , Smita Kayal , Prasanth Ganesan
Background: TCGA and ACRG have classified gastric cancer (GC) into molecular subgroups using genomics. We attempted to classify GC from our region using IHC (Immunohistochemistry) to understand its prognostic significance and compare with similar data from other parts of the world. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of GC patients from years 2017-18. EBV (LMP), MSI (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, MSH6),p53, E-cadherin and PIK3CA were assessed by IHC. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival were evaluated for association with molecular subtypes as defined by TCGA and ACRG classification system. Results: A total of 191patients were included with EBV positivity 35 (18.3 %), MSI 33(17.3 %), p-53 aberration 25(13.1%), E-cadherin negative (29.3%). On univariate analysis, p53 aberration was associated with higher age (>60 yrs), E- cadherin negative with diffuse histology & antro-pyloric region as predominant site. MSI with intestinal histology & antro-pyloric region as predominant site with MSI. The TCGA classification revealed EBV 35 (18%), MSI 28 (15 % ), GS 48 (25 %) and CIN 80 (42% ) subtypes respectively. CIN subtype was seen predominantly above 40 yrs of age (P=0.04), GS subtype was frequently associated with diffuse histology P<0.0001. The ACRG classification revealed MSI 33(17%), MSS/EMT 51 (26.7%), MSS/ p53 normal 91 (47.6%) and MSS/p53 aberrant 16 (8.4) subtypes. MSS/E-cad- subtype was associated with diffuse histology. PIK3CA positivity was higher in CIN (TCGA )& MSI (dmr) (ACRG) respectively. The median OS in MSI was 35 and 32 months higher compared to other subtypes (P<0.0001) in TCGA and ACRG classification respectively. Conclusions: The TCGA and ACRG classification identified molecular subtypes based on IHC from our region and significantly correlated with clinical factors and survival. PIK3CA as an additional marker may be further explored to be included in the classification system. Abbreviation: EBV - Epstein–Barr-virus, MSI – Microsatellite-Instability, GS- Genomic-instability, CIN- Chromosomal-instability, MSS- Microsatellite-stable, EMT-Epithelial-mesenchymal-transition.
Sl.No | Variable | TCGA | ACRG | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N (%) |
I (EBV)
N=35 (18.3) |
II (MSI)
N=28 (14.7) |
III (CIN)
N=80 (41.9) |
IV(GS)
N=48 (25.1) | P-Value |
I (MSI)
N=33 (17.3) |
II
(MSS/EMT) N=51 (26.7) |
III
(MSS/p53 aberrant) N=16 (8.4) |
IV
(MSS/p Normal) N=91 (47.6) | P-Value | ||
1 | Age (n=191) | ≤40 | 10 (28.6) | 3(10.7) | 8(10.0) | 5(10.4) | 0.04 | 5(15.2) | 6(11.8) | 0(0.0) | 15(16.5) | 0.352 |
>40 | 25(71.4) | 25(89.3) | 72(90.0) | 43(89.6) | 28(84.8) | 45(88.2) | 16(100.0) | 76(83.5) | ||||
2 | Histology (n=189) | Diffuse | 10 (28.6) | 7(25.0) | 22(27.8) | 36(76.6) | <0.0001 | 7 (21.2) | 37(74.0) | 2 (13.3) | 29(31.9) | <0.0001 |
Intestinal | 25(71.4) | 51(75.0) | 57(72.2) | 11(23.4) | 26 (78.8) | 13(26.0) | 13(86.7) | 62(68.1) | ||||
3 | PIK3CA (n=191) | Positive | 14(23.3) | 12(20.0) | 27(45.0) | 7(11.7) | 0.02 | ) 14(23.3) | 7(11.7) | 5(8.3) | 34(56.7) | 0.013 |
4 | Survival (n=191) | OS (months) | 16 (9.4- 22.6) | 35 (28.3- 41.7) | 9(6.5- 11.5) | 9(6.2- 11.8) | <0.0001 | 32(17.4-46.6) | 9(6.4-11.6) | 9(1.2-16.8) | 9 (5.8-12.2) | <0.0001 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Rouba Ali-Fehmi
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Emily Harrold
2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Michael J. Hall
2019 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Michael J. Hall