Optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy after endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasia: A multicenter cohort study.

Authors

null

Byung-Wook Kim

The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea;

Byung-Wook Kim , Younghee Choe , Tae Ho Kim , Jun-Won Chung , Joon Sung Kim

Organizations

The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea; , Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, South Korea; , Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, South Korea; , Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea;

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Due to the possibility of metachronous recurrence of gastric neoplasia, surveillance gastroscopy is mandatory after endoscopic resection (ER) for gastric neoplasia. However, there is no consensus on the surveillance gastroscopy interval. This study aimed to find an optimal interval of surveillance gastroscopy and to investigate the risk factors for metachronous gastric neoplasia (MGN). Methods: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively in patients who underwent ER for gastric neoplasia in 3 teaching hospitals from June 2012 to July 2022. Patients were divided into 2 groups; annual surveillance vs. biannual surveillance. The incidence of MGN was identified, and the risk factors for MGN were investigated. Results: Among the 1,533 patients, 677 patients were included (annual surveillance 302, biannual surveillance 375). The median follow-up for all patients was 22 (range, 12‒91) months. MGN was observed in 61 patients and metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) in 26 patients, both of which were not significantly different between the annual and biannual surveillance groups (annual vs. biannual: 26/302 vs. 32/273, P=0.989 in MGN; 13/302 vs. 13/373, P=0.582 in MGC). All the lesions were removed by ER successfully. In a multivariate analysis, severe atrophic gastritis on endoscopy was an independent risk factor for MGC (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4‒10.1; P=0.008). H. pylori infection was not a significant risk factor in this study. Conclusions: Meticulous observation is necessary for patients with severe atrophic gastritis during follow-up gastroscopy after ER for gastric neoplasia. Annual surveillance gastroscopy might be enough after ER for gastric neoplasia.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 316)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.316

Abstract #

316

Poster Bd #

C15

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Metachronous remnant gastric cancer after proximal gastrectomy.

First Author: Kenichi Ishizu

First Author: Joo Hyun Lim

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection at young age.

First Author: Jong-Jae Park