Clinical therapeutic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors

null

Masaaki Murakawa

Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan;

Masaaki Murakawa , Daishi Takahashi , Shinnosuke Kawahara , Yuto Kamioka , Naoto Yamamoto , Shun Tezuka , Satoshi Kobayashi , Makoto Ueno , Manabu Morimoto , Takashi Oshima , Norio Yukawa , Yasushi Rino , Soichiro Morinaga

Organizations

Departments of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; , Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; , Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; , Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; , Departments of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; , Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Kanagawa, Japan; , Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan; , Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan;

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Results from the phase III Prep-02/JSAP-05 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer. However, consensus on neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer has not yet been established, and the effects of neoadjuvant therapy on clinical features of the tumor and improvement in prognosis have not been fully investigated. We aimed to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on resectable pancreatic cancer. Methods: Between 2013 and 2021, 291 patients who underwent curative resection for resectable pancreatic cancer at our hospital were enrolled. The patients were categorized into groups of those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group: n = 91) and those who received up-front surgery (US group: n = 200). Prognostic predictors were examined in (i) all patients, (ii) US group, and (iii) NAC group. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05. Results: The median follow-up periods were 20.7 and 33.2 months in the NAC and US groups, respectively. In the NAC group, 84 of the 91 patients (94.5%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, and three (3.3%) received chemoradiotherapy. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) between the two groups. In the background, the NAC group had lower preoperative CA19-9 levels, lower lymph node ratio (LNR), and smaller tumor size than in the US group. During multivariable analysis of OS, preoperative CA19-9 levels, LNR, modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), resection margin, and tumor size were identified as possible prognostic predictors in all patients and in the US group, whereas LNR and mGPS were identified in the NAC group. Conclusions: The prognostic significance of preoperative CA19-9 level, tumor size, and LNR were counteracted in the NAC group. These findings may indicate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Pancreatic Cancer,Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Small Bowel Cancer

Sub Track

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 677)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.677

Abstract #

677

Poster Bd #

J2

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Mary P. Martos

First Author: Amit Jethanandani

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Impact of patient characteristics and treatment patterns on outcomes in potentially resectable pancreatic cancer (PC).

First Author: Andrew Steinmetz