CARINA interim analysis: A non-interventional study of real-world treatment sequencing and outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma initiated on first-line checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy.

Authors

null

Paul D. Nathan

Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Northwood, United Kingdom

Paul D. Nathan , Jennifer Allison , Natalie Charnley , Agnieszka Michael , Kathryn Moore , Anand Sharma , Bhupinder Klair , Valérie Perrot , James Larkin

Organizations

Mount Vernon Cancer Center, Northwood, United Kingdom, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, United Kingdom, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, United Kingdom, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Middlesex, United Kingdom, Ipsen, Slough, United Kingdom, Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Ipsen

Background: First-line (1L) checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based combinations have become standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Data are required to inform optimal sequencing of aRCC therapies. CARINA is a non-interventional study of treatment sequencing and outcomes in patients with aRCC initiated on 1L CPI-based combination therapy. We report the results of a pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: We reviewed electronic prescribing records from participating UK specialist centers to identify patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with aRCC who received 2L therapy after 1L CPI-based combination therapy. The primary objective was to determine the treatment pathway for patients with aRCC who initiated treatment with a CPI-based combination and received subsequent therapy. Secondary objectives included treatment duration and objective response rate (ORR). Outcomes were evaluated for all patients (enrolled population [EP]) and for the patient subgroup who received 2L cabozantinib. Results: In total, 129 patients were eligible for inclusion in this interim analysis of the EP (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 60.0 [9.9] years; 75.2% male; 77.3% clear-cell aRCC). Of these patients, 82.9% received 1L ipilimumab + nivolumab (Ipi + Nivo, n = 107) and 17.1% received axitinib + avelumab (Axi + Ave, n = 22); median (95% CI) duration of 1L treatment was 10.2 (9.1–17.1) weeks, ORR was 18.4%. The most commonly prescribed 2L therapies after Ipi + Nivo were cabozantinib (74.8%) and sunitinib (13.1%); the most commonly prescribed 2L therapies after Axi + Ave were lenvatinib + everolimus (45.5%) and cabozantinib (31.8%). Median (95% CI) duration of all 2L therapies was 23.6 (14.0–28.3) weeks, and median duration of 2L cabozantinib was 28.1 (20.1–37.1) weeks. ORR to 2L therapy was 30.4% for the EP, and 38.8% for the subgroup of patients who received 2L cabozantinib. Conclusions: In this interim analysis, the most commonly prescribed 2L therapies were cabozantinib and sunitinib after Ipi + Nivo, and lenvatinib + everolimus and cabozantinib after Axi + Ave. Antitumor response with 2L cabozantinib was observed after prior CPI-based therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04957160.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04957160

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 6; abstr 626)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.6_suppl.626

Abstract #

626

Poster Bd #

E16

Abstract Disclosures