Ramucirumab beyond progression plus TAS 102 in patients with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or the gastroesophageal junction, after treatment failure on a ramucirumab-based therapy: Final results of the phase II RE-ExPEL study.

Authors

null

Thorsten Oliver Goetze

Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany;

Thorsten Oliver Goetze , Alexander Stein , Sylvie Lorenzen , Timorshah Habibzada , Eray Goekkurt , Peter Herhaus , Disorn Sookthai , Kristina Ihrig , Claudia Pauligk , Salah-Eddin Al-Batran

Organizations

Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, and Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center, Frankfurt, Germany; , Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis Eppendorf (HOPE) and University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), Hamburg, Germany; , Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Munich, Germany; , Krankenhaus Nordwest, University Cancer Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; , München Klinikum Rechts Der Isar Der TU München, III, Medizinische Klinik Und Poliklinik, München, Germany; , Institut für Klinische Krebsforschung IKF am Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt, Germany;

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Lilly

Background: Based on results of prior trials (TAGS, REGARD, RAINBOW), it seems promising to combine Ramucirumab (Ram) beyond progression (PD) with TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil). The purpose of RE-ExPEL is to investigate the tolerability, safety and benefit of Ram beyond PD in combination with TAS-102 in advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA). Methods: This is a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label investigator initiated pilot trial. 20 ram-pretreated patients (pts) with advanced EGA were enrolled to a maximum of 4 cycles of ramucirumab 8mg/kg every two weeks (days 1, 15; qd28) plus TAS-102 35 mg/m2/p.o. bid (d1-5 and d8-12; qd28). Primary endpoint (EP) was tolerability and toxicity, defining a positive trial if SAE rate according (acc.) to CTCAE 5.0 will increase less than 30% (up to 55%) compared with results from TAGS (SAE-rate 43%). Secondary EPs are further safety data and efficacy data, OS, PFS and ORR. Results: 20 pts (20% female) were enrolled between Oct 2020 and Aug 2021, 20% gastric and 80% GEJ- cancers, 55% of pts with ECOG 0. Results of the final analysis showed that only 25% of pts had at least one SAE and the total no. of SAEs was 9, one with fatal outcome, all without relationship to systemic therapy and no SUSAR reported. RE-ExPEL was able to show a median OS of 9.07 mo (95% CI 5.42-10.09) and a DCR of 45%. 90% of pts got study medication in 3rd line whereas 10% were even further line pts. Conclusions: The safety data showed a favorable safety profile with a low rate of severe toxicity for ram+TAS-102, maybe due to the long disease stabilization and therefore less tumor associated symptoms. Regarding the primary safety endpoint, the trial was positive with even a numerically lower SAE rate compared with TAGS. Furthermore, RE-ExPEL was able to show very promising efficacy data for the combination ram plus TAS-102 with median OS of 9.07 mo. Ram+TAS-102 seems to be more effective than TAS-102 alone acc. to TAGS-trial respecting the limitation of the RE-ExPEL one arm study design with only 20pts. The combination needs further evaluation in a randomized phase III trial. Clinical trial information: NCT04517747.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other GI Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04517747

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 4; abstr 359)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.4_suppl.359

Abstract #

359

Poster Bd #

E20

Abstract Disclosures