Uptake in genetic testing in patients with pancreatic cancer with oncologist-driven testing protocol.

Authors

null

Traci King

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Traci King, Page Widick, Rodrigo Paredes, Oliver Klein, Jill Krejdovsky, Nadine M. Tung, Mary Linton Bounetheau Peters

Organizations

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The objective was to compare the uptake of genetic testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) seen at a single center (1) before the 2019 NCCN recommendation of universal screening for genetic mutations in all new PDAC diagnoses, (2) after this change in guideline, and (3) after transitioning to an oncologist-driven genetic testing protocol. Methods: A retrospective review of patient records seen for a new PDAC diagnosis at BIDMC between May 2018-May 2022 was performed. Patients were categorized into three groups by date of visit: pre-guideline change (5/2018-4/2019), post-guideline change (5/2019-12/ 2020), and after implementation of an oncologist-driven testing protocol (12/ 2020-5/2022). The primary outcome was the differences in rates of testing between each time period. Results: An increase in rates of genetic testing occurred between each successive time period. Pre-guideline change, 22% of patients had testing sent, and this increased to 32% post-guideline. With the oncologist-driven testing, this increased to 73%. There was an increase in referrals for genetic testing from the pre- to post-guideline change time periods (42% to 61%). However, in both groups, the number of patients who completed testing was approximately half of those who were referred (23% and 34%, respectively). Conclusions: Our cancer center moved to oncologist-driven testing to increase uptake in the wake of a guideline change recommending universal testing of all PDAC patients. By this protocol, germ-line testing is sent by the medical oncologist at the initial multidisciplinary clinic visit, rather than following a consultation with our genetic counseling team. With this change, there was a dramatic increase in genetic testing (32% to 73%), thereby capturing approximately 10 additional patients with actionable pathogenic variants. However, this change necessitated additional resources in the multidisciplinary clinic and time from the oncologist to consent for testing. In addition, the expertise of cancer genetics counselors was not provided to all patients. We attempted to address the latter via selective referral after positive results. Despite these trade-offs, oncologist-driven testing successfully met the goal of increasing our adherence with guideline-based genetic testing of all PDAC patients.

Pre-Guideline (n = 82)Post-Guideline (n = 154)Oncologist-Driven (n = 128)
Age at diagnosis
70.4 yrs
67.9 yrs
68.3 yrs
Female
50.0% (41)
49.4% (76)
42.0% (54)
White (non Hispanic)
72.0% (59)
74.0% (114)
71.9% (92)
Black/African American
11.0% (9)
10.4% (16)
4.7% (6)
Stage IV at diagnosis
20.7% (17)
37.0% (57)
23.4% (30)
ECOG 0 or 1 at diagnosis
81.7% (67)
79.9% (123)
78.9% (101)
Genetics referral placed
42.7% (35)
61.0% (94)
0.8% (1)
Genetic testing sent
22.0% (18)
31.8% (49)
73.4% (94)
Pathologic mutation identified in tested
22% (4)
14.3% (7)
18.1% (17)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience

Sub Track

Guideline-Concordant Care Initiatives

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 33)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.033

Abstract #

33

Poster Bd #

B3

Abstract Disclosures