Rural-urban disparities in uptake of lung cancer screening.

Authors

null

Soumya J. Niranjan

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Soumya J. Niranjan, Desiree Rivers, Rekha Ramchandran, Edward Murrell, Sejong Bae, Mark T. Dransfield, Isabel C. Scarinci

Organizations

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Medicine, Birmingham, AL

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: In Alabama, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. High lung cancer incidence and mortality rates are attributed to high smoking rates among underserved, low-income, and rural populations. Residents in rural Alabama tend to be older, engage in risky health behaviors, and have lower adherence to preventive care than their urban and suburban counterparts. Disparities in mortality rates between rural and urban areas are substantial for lung cancer. It can be explained by increased tobacco use and the preponderance of late-stage diagnoses following the lack of uptake of lung cancer screening (LCS). Therefore, we examined factors associated with LCS uptake among patients referred for screening at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB). Methods: A retrospective cohort of patients at UAB who were eligible for lung cancer screening between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2020 was used to define the cohort. Eligibility was defined as individuals between 55-80 years old, without diagnostic codes for lung cancer (ICD-9 162.9 or ICD-10 C34.90 within the past ten years), and had a smoking history. Patient demographic variables included Age, Sex, Race/Ethnicity, RUCA codes, and distance from UAB. Chi-square tests and Student t-tests were used to compare screening uptake across patient demographic and clinical variables. Bivariate analyses were used to determine significant predictors of lung cancer screening uptake at UAB. Results: Of the 67,355 identified as eligible for LCS, only 1147 (0.017%)were screened. Sixteen individuals were not AL residents and therefore were not included in further analysis. Of those 1129 individuals screened, the mean age was 67.02, male (54.92%) and Non-Hispanic White (57.77%). Compared to those not screened (97.86%), those screened (2.14%) were more likely to live in an urbanized area. Additionally, compared to those not screened (50.52 mi), those screened were more likely to live closer to UAB (22.06 mi). Conclusions: Findings show a substantial disparity between adults living in rural areas and those living in more urbanized areas regarding LCS use. Furthermore, the study provides evidence that LCS has not reached all subgroups and that additional targeted efforts are needed to increase lung cancer screening uptake.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience

Sub Track

Access to Timely Detection and Referral

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 119)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.119

Abstract #

119

Poster Bd #

D18

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Rural-urban disparities in lung cancer-related mortality in the United States.

First Author: Shiva Jashwanth Gaddam

First Author: Soumya J. Niranjan

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Lung cancer screening status and acceptability of a personalized approach in Texas.

First Author: Paul Resong