Provider-led advance care planning in community oncology: A successful multidisciplinary quality improvement intervention.

Authors

null

Sandhya Mudumbi

Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN

Sandhya Mudumbi, Leah Owens, Christy L Schneider, Susan A Frailley, John Arrowsmith, Pam Waddell, Kim Vanatta, Larry Edward Bilbrey, Kathleen L Murphy, L. Johnetta Blakely, Stephen Matthew Schleicher, Natalie R. Dickson

Organizations

Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, Tennessee Oncology PLLC., Nashville, TN, Tennessee Oncology - Nashville, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Advanced care planning (ACP) is an important aspect of shared decision making in cancer treatment. Due to its importance, in 2016, Medicare expanded coverage and reimbursement for advance care planning (ACP) services (CPT codes 99497 and 99498). Despite this, ACP has been underutilized in practice. Methods: Tennessee Oncology aimed to increase knowledge and utilization of this service by medical oncologists and advance practice providers and corresponding CPT codes through an educational and quality improvement project. We formed a multidisciplinary team with individuals representing medical oncology providers, palliative care team, billing and accounting, information technology and informatics, nursing, navigation team, and operations. This team created an educational video, incorporating the “PAUSE” framework for addressing advance care planning and its role in community oncology, and details of documentation and billing. We also built in documentation templates into the medical oncology note and created a process to automate the charge capture to avoid additional steps for oncology providers. Results: Prior to this initiative, there was no baseline method to measure ACP and corresponding documentation. After two months of launching our educational video and new documentation templates, 120 documented ACP discussions were completed. ACP documentation was performed by 61 total providers practicing across 16 clinics. Providers completing documentation included both medical oncology (n = 53, 86%) and palliative care (n = 8). Of medical oncology providers, 39 (73%) were physicians and 14 (27%) were advanced practice providers. The three most common cancer diagnoses in ACP encounters were lung (20%), breast (13%), and prostate (8%). Conclusions: This combination of education and automation with multidisciplinary team input helped establish a baseline for ACP measurement that will help identify gaps and improve ACP discussions and documentation in our practice going forward.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Palliative and Supportive Care,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Palliative Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 209)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.209

Abstract #

209

Poster Bd #

B6

Abstract Disclosures