Implementing suicide risk screening as a part of routine cancer care.

Authors

null

Umberto Donato

USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL

Umberto Donato, Oliver Nguyen, Rachael McCormick, Emma Hume, Amir Alishahi, Jessica Yasmine Islam, Julie E. Hallanger-Johnson, Scott Michael Gilbert, Kea Turner

Organizations

USF Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, University of South Florida, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Department of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are at increased risk for suicide. Few studies have tested approaches to preventing suicide in this population, such as routine suicide risk screening. To address this issue, the current study pilots and assesses the feasibility and implementation of a suicide risk screening program for HNC patients at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. Methods: Routine screening was implemented at all in-person visits in the HNC clinic from February 1, 2021 – January 31, 2022 using the PHQ-9. Patients with passive suicidal ideation were consequently screened by social work for active suicidal ideation. Results: Most (92.6% or 1519/1641) HNC patients with a scheduled in-person visit completed at least one suicide risk screening; 9,968 screenings were completed (mean: 3.7; SD: 3.8 per patient) in total. Among patients who were screened, 3% (49/1519) of HNC patients reported passive suicidal ideation and 0.3% (5/1519) were identified as having active suicidal ideation. Patients with five or more visits were more likely to participate in screening compared with patients who only had one visit during the study period (100% vs. 82.7%; P <.0001). Other patient factors, such as race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status, were not associated with screening participation. Conclusions: Findings suggest suicide screening was feasible and effective at identifying patients at an increased risk for suicide. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the impact of suicide screening on suicide prevention and further research is required to scale up suicide screening to reach additional cancer patients.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Palliative and Supportive Care,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Psychosocial, Spiritual, Cultural, and Financial Support Services

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 216)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.216

Abstract #

216

Poster Bd #

B13

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Shivani Sharma

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Frailty screening in head and neck cancer care: Implementation outcomes and clinician perspectives.

First Author: Eden Brauer

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Addressing suicidal ideation in oncology patients.

First Author: Lyndsey Sandow

Abstract

2018 Cancer Survivorship Symposium

Suicide risk among cancer survivors: Head and neck versus other cancers.

First Author: Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters