Strategic team engagement for successful documentation of pain management.

Authors

null

Christine Bates

Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, AZ

Christine Bates, Erin Crum, Donald J. Brooks, Grant Andres

Organizations

Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, AZ, McKesson, The Woodlands, TX, Arizona Oncology Associates, PC-Hope, Tucson, AZ, Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Pain is experienced by a majority of cancer patients, often having a significant negative impact on their quality of life. Effective documentation of pain scores and plan of care provide care teams with data for decision-making to improve pain management. In Q2 of 2021 documentation deficiencies were identified. Process improvement interventions were initiated through the remainder of 2021 to support clinical teams. Methods: Over the course of twelve months our practice sought to improve documentation of pain management through a multi-pronged approach. Execution began with initiation of the Quality and Safety Committee early in 2021 to engage key stakeholders. Our Chain of Command Project identified strategic members of the administrative and clinical leadership teams at the individual clinic level who initiated monthly meetings to promote quality awareness and engagement. Quality measures associated with pain management, MIPS 143 and 144, were examined with assistance from our Value Based Care Transformation Team. Monthly provider scorecard distribution commenced Q2 to identify documentation inconsistencies related to pain management. Providers, medical assistants, and scribes were provided education and training related to appropriate pain management documentation workflows. Follow up audits were performed by the Quality team. In Q3 and Q4 the Quality team collaborated with Human Resources to identify new employees and facilitate education on quality metric capture within a month of hire. Results: The data above is a representation of all clinics and patients treated. The interventions resulted in improved metrics from 2020 to 2022 YTD: MIPS 143 +5.5%, MIPS 144 +27.3%, and PIMSH4 +6.3%. Conclusions: Effective change management occurred from the top down with additional engagement of administrative and clinical members. Analysis of the internal structure and deficiencies was needed with implementation of metric training. Data transparency helped with engagement and managing documentation of MIPS 143 and 144. Next steps include leveraging the current documentation processes to improve PIMSH4, ultimately improving the quality of life for patients.

Pain Management Quality Measures
2020
2021
2022 YTD*
MIPS 143: Pain Intensity Quantified
93.5%
95.7%
99.0%
MIPS 144: Pain Care Plan
63.8%
89.0%
91.1%
PIMSH4: Patient-Reported Pain Improvement
31.0%
32.0%
37.3%

*Data represents January-May 2022

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience

Sub Track

Team-Based Approaches to Care Delivery

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 53)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.053

Abstract #

53

Poster Bd #

B23

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The impact of end-of-life quality metrics on date of death and hospice documentation over time.

First Author: Divya Deepak

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Quality of pain management in patients with cancer in the outpatient setting.

First Author: Biplov Adhikari

First Author: S. M. Qasim Hussaini

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of a mortality prediction tool on end-of-life (EOL) quality measures.

First Author: Jody S. Garey