Efficacy of a brief telemedicine-based cognitive behavioral treatment (BRIGHT) versus attention control for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress: A randomized trial.

Authors

Evan Graboyes

Evan Michael Graboyes

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

Evan Michael Graboyes, Stacey N Maurer, Wendy Balliet, Hong Li, Amy M. Williams, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters, Lynne Padgett, Flora Yan, Tamar Gordis, Angie Rush, Kenneth J. Ruggiero, Katherine R. Sterba

Organizations

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, MI, Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Durham, NC, Washington DC Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Background: Nearly 1 in 3 head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors suffer from body image distress (BID), a source of devastating psychosocial morbidity that impairs quality of life. Evidence-based strategies to manage BID among HNC survivors are lacking. This trial evaluates the preliminary efficacy of BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment), a brief tele-cognitive behavioral intervention, relative to attention control (AC), at reducing BID among HNC survivors. Methods: HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to BRIGHT (n = 20) or AC (n = 24). BRIGHT was delivered by a psychologist in 5 weekly video tele-medicine sessions. AC consisted of dose- and delivery-matched survivorship education. Changes in HNC-related BID and cancer-related BID were assessed using the IMAGE-HN and Body Image Scale (BIS), respectively. The effect of BRIGHT vs AC was analyzed using generalized linear models. Clinical response (proportion of patients with a clinically meaningful change in IMAGE-HN and BIS scores) for BRIGHT vs AC was analyzed with logistic regression. Results: The median age was 63 years (range 41-80) and 61% had stage III/IV HNC. BRIGHT decreased HNC-related BID from baseline to 1- and 3-months post-intervention relative to AC (Table). At 3-months post intervention, the response rate of BRIGHT on HNC-related BID was 6.6-fold higher than AC (OR = 6.6; 90% CI 2.0 to 21.8). BRIGHT decreased cancer-related BID from baseline to 3-months post-intervention vs AC (Table). The improvement in HNC-related BID and cancer-related BID for BRIGHT vs AC at 3-months was clinically significant and the effect size was large (Cohen’s d = -0.9, 90% CI -1.4 to -0.4 for each). Conclusions: In this pilot RCT, BRIGHT results in clinically meaningful improvements in BID among HNC survivors. These promising preliminary data support conducting a large efficacy trial to establish BRIGHT as the first evidence-based treatment for HNC survivors with BID. Clinical trial information: NCT03831100.

Effect of BRIGHT vs AC on HNC-related BID and cancer-related BID.


Effect

Mean difference (BRIGHT vs AC)
90% CI
P-value
Δ IMAGE-HN score from baseline



1 mo
-8.0
-15.9 to 0.0
0.1
3 mos
-17.1
-25.6 to -8.6
0.002
Δ BIS score from baseline



1 mo
-2.1
-5.0 to 0.9
0.2
3 mos
-5.8
-9.1 to -2.5
0.006

IMAGE-HN score range 0-84, higher scores indicate greater HNC-related BID BIS score range 0-30, higher scores indicate greater cancer-related BID.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Palliative and Supportive Care,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Psychosocial, Spiritual, Cultural, and Financial Support Services

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03831100

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 212)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.212

Abstract #

212

Poster Bd #

B9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Opioid tapering and discontinuation for head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.

First Author: Talya Salz

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

The role of primary care in opioid prescribing for head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors.

First Author: Talya Salz

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Timeframe for lymphedema therapy for head and neck cancer survivors.

First Author: Cristina Kline-Quiroz