Methylene blue for the treatment of oral mucositis related to radiation therapy of head and neck cancers: An uncontrolled cohort.

Authors

null

Carlos Roldan

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Carlos Roldan, Lakshmi Koyyalagunta, David Ira Rosenthal, Keith Warner, Lei Feng

Organizations

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Biostatistics, Houston, TX

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Oral mucositis is a feared complication of radiation therapy of head and neck cancers, causing severe pain that affects oral functioning, nutrition, and quality of life, as well as therapy non-adherence or failure. Growing reports suggested that methylene blue (MB) oral-rinse was an effective and safe treatment for this oral pain. Methods: In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MB oral-rinse for the treatment of oral pain from mucositis in patients treated with radiation therapy of head/neck, we retrospectively evaluated patients who experienced refractory pain despite conventional therapy. Results: We identified 58 patients who received MB oral-rinse. Most were receiving treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue (n = 26, 44.83%) and squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil (n = 14, 24.1%). The most common cancer therapy used was chemotherapy plus radiation (n = 23, 39.66%). The median duration of symptoms was 14 days. The mean NRS pain score before MB oral-rinse therapy was 7.59 (±1.68 standard deviation [SD]; median 8), and after therapy, 2.05 (±2.20 SD; median 2) (P< 0.0001). The mean oral function scores (ability to talk, chew, and swallow) before MB oral-rinse therapy was 3.55 (±1.33 standard deviation [SD]; median 3.5), and after therapy, 0.52 (±0.86 SD; median 0) (P < 0.0001). Among 58 patients, n = 11; 18.92% had percutaneous feeding tubes placed before using MB oral rinse. Of those, four (36%) were soon removed after pain was controlled using MB. A few patients had PEG tubes inserted despite using MB oral rinse (n = 2; 3.44%), one for malnourishment and another for dehydration. Few adverse events were reported (n = 9, 15.48%) Three patients experienced oral burning sensation during the first-time use. One patient discontinued MB oral-rinse use due to cost of pharmacy compounding charge. Other discontinued it for unknown reason. Conclusions: MB oral-rinse is an effective and safe treatment for refractory pain from oral mucositis related to radiation therapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Palliative and Supportive Care,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Palliative Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 28; abstr 194)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.28_suppl.194

Abstract #

194

Poster Bd #

A19

Abstract Disclosures