Outcomes of classic Hodgkin lymphoma, relapsed within one year of diagnosis, in the era of novel agents.

Authors

null

Sanjal Desai

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Sanjal Desai , Michael Alexander Spinner , Kevin A. David , Veronika Bachanova , Gaurav Goyal , Raya Saba , Kathleen Anne Dorritie , Jacques Mario Azzi , Elyse Harris , Brendon Fusco , Nuttavut Sumransub , Haris Hatic , Uroosa Ibrahim , Siddharth Iyengar , Katherine Cynthia Rappazzo , Firas Baidoun , Victor Manuel Orellana-Noia , Catherine S. Magid Diefenbach , Ranjana H. Advani , Ivana N. M. Micallef

Organizations

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Rochester, MN, Saint Joseph Hospital, Chicago, IL, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, New York University School of Medicine, Newyork City, NY, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, Department of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Jersey, NJ, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine Mount Sinai, New York City, NY., New York City, NY, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, Cleveland, OH, Rhode Island Hospital, Atlanta, GA, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Primary refractory disease (PRD) and early relapse (ER) are predictors of poor prognosis in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In this multicenter retrospective study, we describe outcomes of PRD and ER in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) cHL treated with salvage therapy (ST) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: Of 14 sites, adult patients with R/R cHL who received ST and underwent ASCT were enrolled. PRD was defined as progression on frontline chemoimmunotherapy or within 6 months of diagnosis. ER was defined as relapse from 6 months-1 yr of diagnosis. Pts who relapsed >1 yr of diagnosis were called late relapses (LR). Study objectives were Overall response rates (ORR), CR rates, PFS, and OS. Results: Of 986 total pts, 160 had PRD, 365 had ER and 461 had LR. Significantly higher number of pts with PRD, but not ER, had bulky disease (41% vs 27%, p<0.01) and B symptoms (53% vs 38%, p<0.001) than LR. Higher proportions of pts with PRD and ER required >1 line of ST (44% vs 30% vs 23%, p<0.001) before ASCT and received BV maintenance (25% vs 24% vs 16%, p<0.05). When adjusted for B symptoms and Bulky disease, PRD and ER had significantly lower ORR (65% vs 76% vs 84%, p<0.001) and CR (37% vs 46% vs 57%, p<0.001) to first ST than LR. Pts with PRD and ER had significantly lower PFS (56.3%, 61.4%, vs 77.6%, p<.0001) and OS (93% vs 89% vs 94%, p=0.01) than LR. In pts with ER, Brentuximab/bendamustine (BBV) and brentuximab vedotin/nivolumab (BV/nivo) had a trend towards higher ORR (92% vs 92% vs 75%) but significantly higher CR (79.2% vs 76% vs 42%, p<0.01) than platinum based chemotherapy (PBC). In pts with PRD, BBV and BV/Nivo had a statistically insignificant trend towards higher ORR and CR than PBC. The table shows 2 yr PFS by type of ST in PRD, ER, LR. There was no difference in PFS by time to relapse in BV/nivo, CPI and miscellaneous agents. BV/Nivo had a significantly higher PFS than PBC in PRD (88% vs 48%, p<0.05) and ER (95% vs 57%, p<0.05). There was no difference in PFS of PBC and other ST in PRD, ER or LR. OS was not significantly associated with type of ST in either group. Conclusions: PRD and ER are associated with lower response to ST and survival after ASCT compared to late relapse. In pts with PRD and ER, BV/Nivo has high ORR and CR and leads to significantly higher PFS comparable to pts with late relapse and may be preferable ST regardless of time to relapse.

Type of ST
PRD % (CI95)
ER % (CI95)
LR % (CI95)
P
PBC (541)
48.2 (34.9–61.5)
57 (51–63)
76 (71–81)
<0.001
BBV (78)
53 (23–83)
63 (46–80)
73 (58–88)
NS
BV/Nivo (60)
89 (78–100)
95 (91–99)
96 (93–99)
NS
BV alone (105)
57 (39–75)
61 (48–74)
78 (69–86)
NS
CPI (24)
78 (60–96)
80 (61–99)
84 (74–94)
NS
Gem (97)
35 (1–70)
54 (40–68)
63 (55–71)
NS
Misc (68)
65 (48–82)
68 (53–83)
70 (62–78)
NS

BV; brentuximab vedotin, CPI; checkpoint inhibitors, Gem; gemcitabine-based therapy, NS; not significant, P; p value, CI95; 95% confidence interval.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Hodgkin Lymphoma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 7515)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7515

Abstract #

7515

Poster Bd #

169

Abstract Disclosures