Radical versus local surgical excision for early rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Sarah El-Nakeep

Ain Shams University · Department of General Internal Medicine MD, Cairo, Egypt

Sarah El-Nakeep , Samragnyi Madala , Anusha Chidharla , Benjamin Martin , Anup Kasi

Organizations

Ain Shams University · Department of General Internal Medicine MD, Cairo, Egypt, Northwell Health, Staten Island, NY, University of Illinois at Peoria, Peoria, IL, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third common cancer worldwide. Radical excision (RE) as total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer carries a higher risk of mortality and morbidity, while local excision (LE) could decrease these postoperative risks. However, the long-term oncologic outcomes of LE are still debatable. We aim to study the effect of LE versus RE in T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed and CENTRAL databases, using an optimized search-strategy from inception until 15 June 2021, without restriction on publication date or status. We included only cohort and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two authors independently screened the title, abstracts, and full-text manuscripts for inclusion and data extraction. All included trials contained at least one of the primary outcomes. We used RevMan 5.4 tool for data analysis. We calculated both hazards ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) for the 5-years survival analyses, with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed both clinical and statistical heterogeneity of the studies; I2>75% was considered highly heterogeneous. We used random effect model (REM). We used standardized mean difference (SMD) for hospitalization days. We conducted a subgroup analysis of patients with T1-only without adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy (CRT). Results: We retrieved from the search a total of 1243 reports. A total of 18 studies were included for final meta-analysis (4 RCTs and 14 retrospective cohorts). Nine studies were multi-central while ten were unicentral studies. We did not find any difference in risk ratio (RR) between overall survival (OVS) and disease-free survival (DFS). But there were higher HRs in OVS and DFS with LE as compared to RE. A higher recurrence rate was also seen with LE. Six studies showed absent 30-days postoperative mortality in both groups so we used peto-odds ratio. Postoperative mortality and morbidity were lower with LE rather than RE. Conclusions: LE for early stage rectal cancer has a higher risk of decreased 5-year OVS and DFS than RE, with higher local recurrence rate. However, LE is associated with lower early postoperative mortality, morbidity, and hospitalization days, as compared to RE. Patient selection is key to balance these risks for the optimal outcome.

LE vs. RE meta-analysis results.

Outcome or Subgroup
Number of Studies
Number of Participants
Statistical methods
Estimate effect, 95% CI
1- OVS in 5-years
14
23717
HR
1.41 [1.14, 1.74]
2- OVS in 5-years %
15
27037
RR
0.95 [0.91, 0.99]
3- DFS in 5-years
10
2568
HR
1.95 [1.36, 2.78]
4- DFS in 5-years %
10
3541
RR
0.93 [0.87, 1.01]
5- Local recurrence rate %
13
6952
RR
2.85 [1.86, 4.36]
6- Mortality in 30-days
10
8800
Peto Odds Ratio
0.36 [0.22, 0.59]
7- Total post-operative morbidity
7
671
RR
0.38 [0.18, 0.80]
8- Hospital stay post-operative
5
3336
SMD
-2.23 [-3.64, -0.83]
9- OVS T1 only- without CRT
6
14275
HR
1.46 [1.08, 1.99]

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Local-Regional Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 3622)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3622

Abstract #

3622

Poster Bd #

415

Abstract Disclosures