ROCC/GOG-3043: A randomized non-inferiority trial of robotic versus open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors

null

Kristin Leigh Bixel

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH

Kristin Leigh Bixel , Mario M. Leitao Jr., Dana Meredith Chase , Allison Quick , Peter C Lim , Ramez Nassef Eskander , Walter H. Gotlieb , Salvatore LoCoco , Martin A Martino , Colleen McCormick , Tashanna K. N. Myers , Krishnansu Sujata Tewari , Brian M. Slomovitz , Joan L. Walker , Larry J. Copeland , Bradley J. Monk , Leslie M. Randall

Organizations

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Creighton University School of Medicine at St Joseph's Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, Center of Hope at Renown Regional Medical Center, Reno, NE, UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA, Surgical Oncology McGill University-SMBD Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, St. Vincent's Health System, Jacksonville, FL, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Baystate Med Ctr, Longmeadow, MA, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine, CA, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami, FL, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, GOG Foundation, Creighton University, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with improved perioperative safety outcomes, but, in 2018, the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer (LACC) trial, a non-inferiority study comparing laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer, reported significantly worse disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS) in the MIS group. Criticisms of the LACC trial include lack of proper preoperative imaging and assessment, use of transcervical uterine manipulators, and lack of proper tumor containment leading to peritoneal contamination. Subsequent retrospective studies have reported conflicting results. Given the potential benefit of MIS, the ROCC trial seeks to address the limitations of the LACC trial. Methods: ROCC is a multi-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial. The primary objective is to determine whether robotic-assisted (RBT) radical hysterectomy is not inferior to abdominal (OPEN) approach with respect to 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary objectives include DSS, OS, patterns of recurrence, peri- and postoperative complications, long-term morbidity, impact on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and development of lower extremity lymphedema (LEL). Key inclusion criteria include patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, and adenosquamous cell carcinoma of FIGO 2018 stage IA2-IB2. All patients must have a preoperative pelvic MRI confirming that the cervical tumor is < 4 cm in size, no obvious evidence of extracervical extension and no nodal or other regional metastasis. Intraoperatively, the use of transcervical uterine manipulators is not allowed and specific detailed surgical techniques for proper tumor containment is required. Photographic evidence of specimen with tumor contained is mandated. We estimate the 3-year DFS to be 92% in the control (OPEN) arm. If the DFS does not differ by more than 7% and the one-sided 95% CI does not cross the non-inferiority boundary, then the RBT arm will be deemed non-inferior. 840 patients will be enrolled (420 per arm, 89 events total), which provides 90% power to exclude an absolute decrease in DFS by 7% (HR < = 1.375) with a log-rank test for non-inferiority with a one-sided alpha of 0.05. The primary analysis will be conducted in all randomized patients (ITT). Given the LACC findings of worse oncologic outcomes with MIS, a formal DSMC will conduct periodic reviews of safety including two planned formal interim analyses for futility (harm) after accrual of 370 and 640 patients using an aggressive Lan-DeMets beta-spending function similar to a Pocock boundary. Results of this trial may be practice changing and will either support or refute the findings of the LACC trial. The study is currently activating sites for enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04831580.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04831580

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr TPS5605)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.TPS5605

Abstract #

TPS5605

Poster Bd #

479a

Abstract Disclosures