DUBLIN-3 results on quality of life (QoL) in second/third-line EGFR-wild type NSCLC patients (pts) receiving docetaxel (Doc) with or without plinabulin (Plin) using the validated EORTC QLQ C30 and QLQ LC13 questionnaires.

Authors

null

Trevor Feinstein

Piedmont Cancer Institute, Fayetteville, GA

Trevor Feinstein , Stephan Ogenstad , Dominic Mitchell , Lan Huang , Ramon W. Mohanlal

Organizations

Piedmont Cancer Institute, Fayetteville, GA, Statogen Consulting, LLC, Zebulon, NC, Université de Montréal, Repentigny, China, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, NY, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Plin, a novel immune-enhancing small molecule, enhances dendritic cell maturation and T-cell proliferation. In the ITT population, the Plin/Doc combination had superior Efficacy (mOS; p = 0.0399), Safety (Gr3/4 AE rate/pt/year; p = 0.038) and QTWiST (p = 0.026) vs standard of care (SoC) Doc alone in NSCLC pts in DUBLIN-3 (Han, ESMO 2021). Here we report DUBLIN-3 QoL results. Methods: DUBLIN-3(NCT02504489) was a randomized, single-blinded (pts only), active-controlled Ph3 study in 2nd/3rd line stage IIIB/IV, EGFR wt NSCLC pts with a measurable lesion (RECIST 1.1) in the lung, and ECOG ≤ 2, conducted in US, Australia, and China. Pts (n = 559) were randomized 1:1 to Plin/Doc or Doc/Placebo (21-day (D) cycle). Doc (75 mg/m2 on D1 and Plin 30 mg/m2 on D1 and D8 were given by IV infusion. QoL was evaluated by the validated questionnaires EORTC QLQ C30 and QLQ LC13 (which is specific for Lung Cancer), and patient-reported scores were collected at baseline and D1, D8 of each cycle (C). Results: Baseline characteristics and QLQ C30 and LC13 scores were comparable between both groups. Plin/Doc was well tolerated. Cumulative C30 sand LC13 scores were calculated for each patient. Mean (SEM) change from baseline in cumulative C30 and LC13 scores were comparable for Plin/Doc and Doc in the first 10 cycles, however separated after C10 in favor of Plin/Doc (table). LC13 items in favor of Plin/Doc vs Doc alone, were items 31 (Coughing; p < 0.05), 36 (Sore Mouth; p < 0.01), 37 (Dysphagia; p < 0.01). Conclusions: We previously reported an OS, Safety, and QTWiST benefit with Plin/Doc vs Doc alone (ESMO 2021) in EGFR wild type 2nd/3rd line NSCLC pts from DUBLIN-3. Here, we report statistically significant QoL benefits with Plin/Doc vs Doc alone, as assessed with EORTC QLQ C30 and LC13, which may be relevant to guide treatment decisions in this generally sick patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT02504489.


C10
C20
C30
C40
C50
C60
Plin/Doc C30
440 (15.6)
499 (23.7)
515 (27.0)
518 (28.1)
519 (28.3)
519 (28.3)
Doc C30
423 (13.2)
457 (18.6)
467 (21.6)
473 (24.4)
479 (27.5)
480 (27.7)
Plin/Doc LC13
93 (4.2)
106 (6.1)*
110 (6.9)*
110 (7.1)*
111 (7.1)
111 (7.1)
Doc LC13
87 (4.3)
93 (5.1)
94 (5.3)
95 (5.6)
96 (5.9)
96 (5.9)

*p < 0.05

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02504489

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 9091)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9091

Abstract #

9091

Poster Bd #

78

Abstract Disclosures