Efficacy, safety and cost effectiveness of reduced-dose olanzapine versus aprepitant as a part of triple-antiemetic therapy in the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors

null

Owais Mohammed

Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India

Owais Mohammed , Narender kumar Thota

Organizations

Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India, Krishna institute of Medical Scicenes, Hyderabad, India

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: In Developing world, Olanzapine at a dose of 10mg is associated with excessive somnolence. Recently, reduced dose Olanzapine 5mg has been found to be equally effective with less sedation. Hence, we intended to conduct a study comparing the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of reduced dose Olanzapine 5mg vs Aprepitant. Objectives: To compare Complete response (no emesis and no rescue therapy) rates between the two groups during three periods: 0 to 24 hours (acute), 25 to 120 hours (delayed), and 0 to 120 hours (overall) after chemotherapy. To compare nausea control rates in the acute, delayed, and overall periods. To evaluate potential adverse effects and compare cost effectiveness of Olanzapine, Aprepitant. Methods: All newly diagnosed cancer patients who were scheduled to receive highly emetogenic chemotherapy (either cisplatin at a dose ≥70 mg/ m2 body surface area, with or without other chemotherapeutic agents, or doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide at a dose of 600 mg /m2) and had a European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2 were randomized 1:1 to receive triple anti emetic regimen comprising of 5HT3 antagonist (Palonosetron)+Steroid (Dexamethasone) + either NK1 antagonist (either Aprepitant 125mg on day 1, 80 mg on days 2, 3 or Fosapprepitant 150mg IV on day 1) or Olanzapine 5mg once daily on days 1-4). Number of Vomiting episodes, use of rescue therapy, nausea, other adverse effects were recorded. Results: A total of 154 patients were eligible for the study, 77 in each arm. The Complete response rates for Aprepitant and Olanzapine during the acute period were 79.22% and 81.81% respectively (p > 0.05), during the delayed period were 74.02% and 70.12% respectively (p > 0.05), during the overall period were 74.02% and 70.12% respectively (p > 0.05). Nausea control rates for Aprepitant and Olanzapine during the acute period were 74.42% and 84.82% respectively (p > 0.05), during the delayed period were 45.45% and 68.83% respectively (p < 0.05), during the overall period were 45.45% and 68.83% respectively (p < 0.05). Most common side effect in patients receiving Olanzapine was Somnolence which was observed in 12.98% patients (CTCAE Grade 2). Most common side effect in patients receiving Aprepitant was fatigue which was seen in 6.5% patients. A 4-day course of Olanzapine costs INR-20/- while a 3-day course of Aprepitant costs INR-1000/- and a single 150mg IV Fosapprepitant costs INR 2500/-. Conclusions: In the developing world, Olanzapine 5mg can be considered as an effective, safe, and a cheaper alternate to Aprepitant as a component of triple antiemetic regimen in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e24078)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e24078

Abstract #

e24078

Abstract Disclosures