Variation of use of targeted therapies and molecular diagnostic testing by practice type for non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer.

Authors

null

Thomas Roberts

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Thomas Roberts , Kenneth L. Kehl , Gabriel A. Brooks , Lynette M. Sholl , Alexi A. Wright , Barbara Bai , Mary Beth Landrum , Nancy Lynn Keating

Organizations

Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Targeted therapies are important first-line treatments for many patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). All patients with newly-diagnosed metastatic NSCLC and CRC should undergo molecular diagnostic testing to guide treatment selection. Methods: We used 100% Medicare fee-for-service data from 2015 through 2019 to identify beneficiaries with incident metastatic NSCLC or CRC receiving systemic therapy and to assign beneficiaries to oncology practices. We then assessed for use of molecular diagnostic testing and targeted therapies in these cohorts. We used linear mixed effects models to assess patient and practice characteristics associated with molecular diagnostic testing and targeted therapy use. Results: Rates of molecular diagnostic testing increased between 2015 and 2019 for NSCLC and CRC. In 2019, rates of molecular diagnostic testing were 85% and 65% for NSCLC and CRC, respectively. Rates of targeted therapy use did not increase over time for NSCLC or CRC, and were 8% and 5%, respectively, in 2019. Compared to National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated cancer centers, rates of molecular diagnostic testing for CRC were 3.7 percentage points lower at practices associated with non-academic hospitals and 10.6 percentage points lower at small independent practices. Rates of targeted therapy use for NSCLC were 4.8, 5.9 and 5.5 percentage points lower at academic medical centers, large independent practices and small independent practices, respectively, compared to NCI centers. Conclusions: Rates of molecular diagnostic testing for NSCLC and CRC increased in recent years, but testing rates remain below recommended levels, and targeted therapy use remains low. Substantial variation in testing and targeted therapy use by practice type suggest that the practice where a patient is treated may impact access to recommended testing and efficacious treatments.

Adjusted and unadjusted rates of use of molecular diagnostics and first-line targeted therapies in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer.


Molecular Diagnostics
Targeted Therapy Use
Practice type
NSCLC
Colorectal Cancer
NSCLC
Colorectal Cancer
Unadjusted rate
Adjusted PP diff.(95% CI)
Unadjusted rate
Adjusted PP diff.(95% CI)
Unadjusted rate
Adjusted PP diff.(95% CI)
Unadjusted rate
Adjusted PP diff.(95% CI)
NCI Center (ref.)
78.9
56.9
16.6

5.0

Academic center
78.3
-1.3 (-3.7 to 1.1)
57.2
0.9 (-3.1 to 4.8)
9.1
-4.8 (-6.5 to -3.2)
6.1
1.2 (-0.4 to 2.8)
Other hospital
79.2
-0.6 (-2.4 to 1.1)
54.4
-3.7 (-6.5 to -0.8)
8.0
-5.4 (-6.6 to -4.2)
4.8
0.3 (-0.9 to 1.5)
Large independent
80.0
-0.1 (-1.5 to 1.7)
54.9
-2.2 (-4.8 to 0.4)
7.4
-5.9 (-7.0 to -4.8)
4.4
-0.1 (-1.1 to 0.9)
Small independent
78.0
-1.3 (-3.0 to 0.4)
46.2
-10.6 (-13.4 to -7.8)
9.5
-5.5 (-6.7 to -4.3)
3.6
-1.1 (-2.3 to 0.02)

PP = percentage point.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 6551)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.6551

Abstract #

6551

Poster Bd #

334

Abstract Disclosures