Phase I/II trial of encorafenib, cetuximab, and nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS), BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors

null

Van K. Morris II

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Van K. Morris II, Christine Megerdichian Parseghian , Michelle Escano , Benny Johnson , Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav , Arvind Dasari , Ryan Huey , Michael J. Overman , Jason Willis , Michael Sangmin Lee , Robert A. Wolff , Bryan K. Kee , Phat Le , Cori Margain , Dave Gallup , Alda Tam , Wai Chin Foo , Lianchun Xiao , Kyuson Yun , Scott Kopetz

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and SWOG, Houston, TX, Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, EMPIRI, Houston, TX, Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Treatment with encorafenib (E) and cetuximab (C) offers response and survival benefit for patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600Emetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). BRAF + EGFR inhibition induced a transient MSI-H phenotype in preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC and may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N). Methods: In this single-arm, single-institution, phase I/II clinical trial, pts with treatment-refractory MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC were eligible. No prior BRAF, MEK, or ERK inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibody, or immunotherapy was permitted. Pts received E (300 mg PO daily), C (500 mg/m2 IV q14 days), and N (480 mg IV q28 days). The primary endpoints were best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5). A Simon two-stage design (H0: p≤.22; Ha: p≥.45, where p = percentage of pts with radiographic response) was employed using a one-sided α =.05 and β =.20. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. To measure ex vivo treatment responses with an E-slice assay (EMPIRI), 300 µm fresh tissue slices from core biopsies were generated and cultured in serum-free media with E, C, and N. Longitudinal changes in viability were measured at days 4, 8, and 12 and compared to baseline viability in each tissue. Ex vivo “response” was defined if < 1X baseline tumor cell viability. Results: With a data cutoff of 2/8/2022, all pts are enrolled: 26 evaluable for toxicity and 23 for response. Median age is 60 years (range, 32-85), and 16 (62%) are female. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) have occurred in 5/26 (19%) patients: colitis, maculopapular rash, leukocytosis, and myositis/myocarditis (all N = 1); asymptomatic elevated amylase/lipase (N = 2). Overall response rate is 48% (95% CI, 27-69), and disease control rate is 96% (95% CI, 78-100). Median PFS is 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.6-NA). For the 11 pts with responses, median duration of response is 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.5-NA). Median OS is 15.1 months (95% CI, 7.7-NA). E-slices showed concordance between pts with radiographic responses and reduction in cell viability, and between non-responders and increase in cell viability. Final results will be presented. Conclusions: E + C + N appears to be effective and well-tolerated for pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC. Ex vivo analysis of pretreatment tissue predicted eventual clinical response in matched patients. A follow-up randomized phase II trial (SWOG 2107) to evaluate encorafenib/cetuximab with or without nivolumab in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC will activate in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04017650.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04017650

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 3598)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3598

Abstract #

3598

Poster Bd #

392

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Van K. Morris II

First Author: Van K. Morris II