Rural cancer care access in the United States: A worsening problem?

Authors

James Bates

James Edward Bates

Emory University, Atlanta, GA

James Edward Bates , Christina Henson

Organizations

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Rural counties have a decreased incidence of cancer relatively to non-rural counties; however, they have higher death rates from cancer. This disparity in death rates is worsening. Patients in rural areas face significant barriers to accessing oncologic care – limited access to oncologic providers and significant travel distances to treatment chief among them. We aimed to assess trends in geographic distribution of medical and radiation oncologists to ascertain trends in access to oncologic specialists in rural areas. Methods: We used the Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners database published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from 2013 and 2019 (the earliest and latest available) to identify radiation oncologists and medical oncologists (including hematology/oncology) based on the Provider Type field. We used the Rural Urban Commuting Area Codes as defined by the US Department of Agriculture; rural was defined as non-metropolitan areas with a < 30% commuting flow to a large urban center consistent with the definition from the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center. The US Health Resources & Services Administration, using a similar definition, defines 19.7% of the US population as rural. Results: In 2013, we identified 10,440 medical oncologists and 4,292 radiation oncologists in the United States. 7.6% of medical oncologists and 8.9% of radiation oncologists practiced in rural areas. In 2019, 7.4% of medical oncologists and 8.5% of radiation oncologists practiced in rural areas (Table). There were 1,430 more medical oncologists practicing in 2019 as compared to 2013; only 83 (5.8%) practice in a rural area. There were 436 additional radiation oncologists with only 21 (4.8%) practicing in a rural area. Growth in both medical oncologists (χ2 = 8.47, p = 0.02) and radiation oncologists (χ2 = 8.47, p = 0.004) was more likely to be in urban than rural areas. Conclusions: While disparities in oncologist distribution along the rural-urban continuum are well known, we establish that these disparities are becoming more pronounced despite increasing awareness. This raises concern that disparities in cancer outcomes in rural patients will continue to worsen. Alternative strategies to increases access to cancer care in rural areas are critical.

Number of oncologists practicing in urban and rural settings in 2013 and 2019.


Urban (n, %)
Rural (n, %)
2013
Medical Oncologists
9647 (92.4%)
793 (7.6%)
Radiation Oncologists
3910 (91.1%)
382 (8.9%)
2019
Medical Oncologists
10994 (92.6%)
876 (7.4%)
 Radiation Oncologists
4325 (91.5%)
403 (8.5%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e18521)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18521

Abstract #

e18521

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Classifying oncologist rurality by practice location and patient population.

First Author: Sarah Cornelius

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Evaluation of the contribution of county characteristics to the rural mortality disparity in cancer.

First Author: Jeffrey Franks

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Oncologist perceptions of health inequity.

First Author: Alexandrina Balanean