CeNtuRIOn: Rucaparib (R) with nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC)—Results of an initial safety cohort.

Authors

null

Marcia Hall

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom

Marcia Hall , Karen Allan , Agnieszka Michael , Andrew R. Clamp , Rosalind Glasspool , Shibani Nicum , Rosemary Lord , Susana N. Banerjee , Joshua Roche , Jamie Stobo , Charlie Gourley

Organizations

Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom, CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom, NCRI and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI), London, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Cancer Research UK

Background: There is an urgent need to improve outcomes for ROC pts; progression free (PFS)/overall survival (OS) are 4-9 months (mo), 12-20mo respectively. ̃50% ROC pts harbour homologous repair deficiencies (HRD), identified by BRCA mutations (m) & Loss of Heterozygosity (LoH). R, a PARP inhibitor (PARPi) has demonstrated efficacy when used as maintenance after chemotherapy (CT), and is superior to CT if used as treatment for ROC BRCAm pts. However repeating PARPi, even in highly selected BRCAm/HRD pts has limited benefit (1.5-2.5mo extra PFS). Single agent immunotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA4 antibodies (Ab)) in ROC pts has been disappointing. Response rate to combined PD-1/CTLA4 Ab in ROC pts is 31.3%. In vitro evidence suggests that combinations of PD-1/CTLA4 Ab /PARPi may be more effective. CeNtuRIOn aims to explore the activity/toxicity of repeat PARPi (R) versus R+I (CTLA4 Ab) versus R+I+N (PD-1 Ab). Here we report safety data from the run-in cohort of 15 ROC pts treated with the triplet combination, RNI. Methods: Eligible pts had received ≥1 and <3 lines CT, were > 3 to <12 months from last platinum CT. Only 1 pt could experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) over initial 6 weeks of treatment. Pts received N 240mg q14 days, I 1mg/kg q42 days intravenously for up to 12mo and R orally, 600mg bd continuously. All bar 1 of 7 pts (recruited 06/19–12/19) received N+I to meet DLT evaluability, but 5 of remaining 6 received < 43% R during safety period. 6 further pts were recruited (08/20-06/21), with ≥60% starting dose R in first 6 weeks now required for evaluability. Review of toxicity/tolerability prompted reduction of R starting dose to 400mg bd and ipilimumab limited to 4 cycles for the last 4 pts. Results: Of all 15 recruits, median age was 64. Adverse events (AE)s are detailed in Table. 7 pts were evaluable for safety assessment: n = 4 started on 600mg bd and n = 3 on 400mg bd R. Median R dose intensity in these 7 was 82.5%. There was 1 DLT: G3 nephritis on day 18. 1 pt died of E. Coli sepsis related to colitis. Outcome data will be presented. Conclusions:R (400mg bd)+N+I (4 cycles only) will be taken forward to phase II. Pts will be randomised 1:1:2 to single agent R, R+I or RNI. Pts recruited to R alone are eligible for 2nd randomisation (1:1) to add I or N+I at progression. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN10490346.

AEs and relationship to treatment (TRAEs) where available*
Any Grade
TRAEs, Any G
Grade ≥3
TRAEs, G≥3
Eval n = 7
Non-E n = 8
Eval n = 7
Non-E n = 8
Eval n = 7
Non-E n = 8
Eval n = 7
Non-E n = 8
Fatigue
7 (100%
7
(88%)
7
(100%)
7
(88%)
3 (43%)
1
(13%)
2 (29%)
1 (13%)
Diarrhoea/colitis
6
(86%)
4 (50%)
6
(86%)
4 (50%)
2 (29%)
2
(25%)
2 (29%)
2
(25%)
Dyspnoea
6
(86%)
7
(88%)
5
(71%)
3 (38%)
1 (15%)
1
(13%)
0
1 (13%)
Rash
5
(71%)
3
(38%)
5
(71%)
3
(38%)
2 (29%)
0


2 (29%)
0


Lymphopenia
4 (57%)
5 (63%)
-
-
4 (57%)
4

(50%)
-
-
Hyponatraemia
3
(43%)
5
(63%)
-
-
2 (29%)
2
(25%)
-
-
Hypo-phosphataemia
6
(86%)
3
(38%)
-
-
4 (57%)
0
-
-
Anaemia
4 (57%)
3 (38%)
-
-
2 (29%)
0
-
-
Myocarditis
1
(14%)
0
-
-
0
0
-
-

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN10490346

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5577)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5577

Abstract #

5577

Poster Bd #

453

Abstract Disclosures