Regorafenib joins immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for previously ICIs plus TKIs failed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients: A retrospective study.

Authors

null

Jie Zhao

Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Jie Zhao , Chao Yang , Guoyong Han , Long Zhang , Chuanwei Jiang , Wenzhou Ding , Yuanchang Hu , Ming Ni , Chen Wu , Yongxiang Xia

Organizations

Hepatobiliary Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: The development of ICIs has promoted a major breakthrough in the field of cancer therapy. A number of patients experience primary or acquired resistance to ICIs based first line therapy. Because of the similar mechanisms, PD-(L)1 inhibitors replacement after PD-(L)1 inhibitors-based therapy resistance is difficult to sustain benefits. Therefore, whether suspending immunotherapy, or maintenance immunotherapy and switching the combination drugs in the follow-up strategy is worth to explore. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of protein kinases involved in angiogenesis, oncogenesis and metastasis. Besides, regorafenib could regulate the immune microenvironment. This retrospective trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of regorafenib in combinations with previous ICI in advanced HCC patients who failed to previous ICI-TKI treatment. Methods: In this study, eligible patients were advanced HCC, who failed to previous treatment with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors. 17 patients were received PD-1 inhibitor the same as the first-line treatment (dosage and mode of administration according to instructions) and regorafenib (40, 80, 120mg/m2, po, qd, d1-21) every 4 weeks, until disease progression, intolerable toxicities, or physician/patient withdrawal. The safety and efficacy were assessed by investigators per CTCAE v5.0 and RECIST v1.1, respectively. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), the secondly endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Results: From Nov 15, 2020 to Jan 31, 2022, 17 patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1 (16 male vs. 1 female, 13 second-line recipients vs. 4 third-line recipients, median age of 55 years) had been enrolled. 52.94% of the patients had BCLC stage B and others had BCLC stage C. The median follow-up was 8.8 months (range, 2.7-14.7). Confirmed ORR and DCR were 41.2% and 64.7%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.21 months (95% CI, 2.65-7.77). For 13 second line patients, confirmed ORR and DCR were 46.2% and 69.2%, respectively. Median OS and DOR had not yet been reached. 12 recipients had treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Most frequent TEAEs (≥5%) included fatigue (15.8%), diarrhea (15.8%), periodontal disease (10.5%), hypertension (10.5%), albuminuria (5.3%). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3 (17.6%) patients included gastrointestinal bleeding, hand-foot syndrome and albuminuria. No Grade 4 TRAE and new safety signal were identified. Conclusions: Regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitor showed a promising efficacy with favorable safety in HCC patients with PD-1 inhibitor resistance, especially in the standard second line patients. Moreover, the strategy showed a higher ORR than RESORCE study (46.2% vs. 10.6%).

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e16118)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e16118

Abstract #

e16118

Abstract Disclosures