Phase 3 randomized study comparing docetaxel-platinum with docetaxel-platinum-5 fluorouracil as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in technically unresectable oral cancer.

Authors

Ajaykumar Singh

Ajaykumar Singh

Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

Ajaykumar Singh , Vijay Maruti Patil , Vanita Noronha , Nandini Sharrel Menon , Pankaj Chaturvedi , Vijayalakshmi Mathrudev , Atanu Bhattacharjee , Sunil Ramdhan Chopade , Sujay Srinivas , Somnath Roy , Tanmoy Mondal , Hollis D'souza , Devendra A Chaukar , P. S. Pai , Sudhir Vasudevan Nair , Shivakumar Thiagarajan , Sarbani Laskar , Kavita Prakash Nawale , Sachin Babanrao Dhumal , Kumar Prabhash

Organizations

Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India, Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, India, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, Tata Memorial, Mumbai, India, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India, Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Hospital, Kolkata, India, Clinical Research Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer(ACTREC),Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar,Navi Mumbai, India

Research Funding

Other

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with DCF (Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5FU) is one of the treatment options in very locally advanced oral cancer (LAOC) and has a survival advantage over the CF (Cisplatin and 5FU) regimen. DC regimen (Docetaxel, Cisplatin) had shown promising results in small series, with a lower rate of adverse events but has never been compared with DCF. Methods: This was a phase 3 open-label superiority randomized study. Adult patients with very LAOC (technically unresectable), ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate organ function were eligible. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 fashion to either DCF or DC regimen. After the administration of 2 cycles, these patients were evaluated in the multidisciplinary clinic. Based on the response, further treatment either surgery followed by adjuvant or radical chemoradiation or palliative therapy was planned. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The key secondary endpoint was adverse events. Results: 495 patients were randomized in this study, 250 patients in arm A and 245 in arm B. At a median follow-up of 39.5 months. The 2-year OS was 29.1% in the DCF and 23.5% in the DC arm respectively (HR=0.81; 95%CI 0.66-0.99, P-value= 0.043). Grade 3 or above adverse events were higher in the DCF arm - oral mucositis (10.6% versus 1.2%), diarrhea (13.6% versus 9.6%), febrile neutropenia (23.2% versus 2.6%), hyponatremia (40.8% versus 20.8%), and hypokalemia (17.9% versus 1.6%). Conclusions: NACT with DCF has a survival benefit over DC in oral cancers but it comes at the cost of an increment in acute adverse events. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/04/006804.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Local-Regional Disease

Clinical Trial Registration Number

CTRI/2016/04/006804

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 6013)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.6013

Abstract #

6013

Poster Bd #

5

Abstract Disclosures