Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute, and Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
Thomas Powles , Elizabeth R. Plimack , Viktor Stus , Tom Waddell , Rustem Gafanov , Frédéric Pouliot , Dmitry Nosov , Bohuslav Melichar , Denis Soulieres , Delphine Borchiellini , Ihor Vynnychenko , Raymond S. McDermott , Sergio Jobim Azevedo , Satoshi Tamada , Anna Kryzhanivska , Chenxiang Li , Joseph E. Burgents , L. Rhoda Molife , Brian I. Rini , Jens Bedke
Background: The randomized, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study (NCT02853331) met its primary and key secondary end points of improved OS, PFS, and ORR with pembro + axi versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced ccRCC. Extended follow-up (42.8-mo median follow-up) continued to show the superior efficacy of pembro + axi versus sunitinib in this patient population. We describe the results of PFS2 for all randomly assigned patients and across IMDC risk categories. Methods: Treatment-naive patients with advanced ccRCC, Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score ≥70% and measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembro 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 35 doses (̃2 y) + axi 5 mg orally twice daily or sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily on a 4-wk on/2-wk off schedule. The end point of this exploratory analysis was PFS2, defined as time from randomization to progression after first subsequent therapy or any-cause death. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS2 and hazard ratios were estimated using a Cox regression model. Results: Of 861 patients, 432 were assigned to receive pembro + axi; 429, to sunitinib. Median time from randomization to the database cutoff date (January 11, 2021) was 42.8 mo (range, 35.6-50.6). Overall, 47.2% of patients (204/432) in the pembro + axi arm and 65.5% of patients (281/429) in the sunitinib arm received ≥1 line of subsequent anticancer therapy. For patients who received subsequent therapy, anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents were the first subsequent treatment for 11.3% of patients (23/204) in the pembro + axi arm and 54.8% of patients (154/281) in the sunitinib arm. In the pembro + axi arm, 82.8% of patients (169/204) received a VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor as first subsequent therapy, as did 43.4% (122/281) in the sunitinib arm. PFS2 results are displayed in the Table. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, PFS2 was longer for patients randomized to pembro + axi compared to sunitinib. Results were consistent across IMDC risk groups. These data support use of pembro + axi for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced ccRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02853331.
ITT | IMDC favorable risk | IMDC intermediate/poor risk | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pembro + axi N = 432 | Sunitinib N = 429 | Pembro + axi n = 138 | Sunitinib n = 131 | Pembro + axi n = 294 | Sunitinib n = 298 | |
Received ≥1 line of subsequent anticancer therapy, n (%) | 204 (47.2) | 281 (65.5) | 64 (46.4) | 87 (66.4) | 140 (47.6) | 194 (65.1) |
Median (95% CI) PFS2, mo | 40.1 (34.9–43.8) | 27.7 (23.1–29.9) | 46.0 (43.8 to NR) | 39.9 (33.5 to NR) | 32.1 (27.9–39.3) | 20.1 (15.9–25.1) |
HR (95% CI) | 0.63 (0.53–0.75) | 0.68 (0.47–0.98) | 0.62 (0.51–0.76) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Brian I. Rini
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Elizabeth R. Plimack
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Ikko Tomisaki
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Manish A. Shah