Differential diagnosis of hematologic and solid tumors using targeted transcriptome and artificial intelligence.

Authors

null

Hong Zhang

Genomic Testing Cooperative, Irvine, CA

Hong Zhang , Maher Albitar , Muhammad Asif Qureshi , Mohsin Wahid , Ahmad Charifa , Aamir Ehsan , Andrew Ip , Ivan De Dios , Wanlong Ma , James McCloskey , Michele Donato , David Samuel DiCapua Siegel , Martin Gutierrez , Andrew L Pecora , Andre Goy

Organizations

Genomic Testing Cooperative, Irvine, CA, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, CorePath Laboratories, San Antonio, TX, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack Unversity Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Livingston, NJ, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Diagnosis and classification of tumors is becoming increasingly dependent on biological and molecular biomarkers. RNA expression profiling using next generation sequencing (NGS) provides information on various biological and molecular changes in the cancer and in the microenvironment. We explored the potential of using targeted transcriptome and artificial intelligence (AI) in the differential diagnosis and classification of various hematologic and solid tumors. Methods: RNA from hematologic neoplasms (N = 2606) and solid tumors (N = 2038) as well as normal bone marrow and lymph node control (N = 806) were sequenced by NGS using a targeted 1408-gene panel. The hematologic neoplasms included 20 different subtypes. Solid tumors included 24 different subtypes. Machine learning is used for comparing two classes at a time. Geometric Mean Naïve Bayesian (GMNB) classifier is used to provide differential diagnosis across 45 diagnostic entities with assigned ranking. Results: Machine learning showed high accuracy in distinguishing between two diagnoses with AUC varied between 1 (Sarcoma vs GIST) and 0.841 (MDS vs normal control) (examples in Table). For differential diagnosis between all 45 different diagnoses, we used 3045 samples for training the GMNB algorithm and 1415 samples for testing. Correct first choice diagnosis was obtained in 100% of ALL, 88% of AML, 85% of DLBCL, 82% of colorectal cancer, 88% of lung cancer, 72% of CLL, and 72% of follicular lymphoma. The algorithm had difficulty in typically overlapping diagnoses and diagnosed as first choice 19% of MDS, 46% of normal, and 12% of MPN. Diagnosis improved significantly when second choice was considered. Conclusions: Targeted RNA profiling with proper AI can provide highly useful tools for the pathologic diagnosis and classification of various cancers. Additional information such as mutation profile and clinical information can improve these algorithms, reduce subjectivity, and minimize errors in pathologic diagnoses.

Two classes
AUC
% Sensitivity
% Specificity
Leave one out AUC
Normal (N) vs AML
0.971
95.2
91
0.967
N vs ALL
0.98
95.5
98.7
0.984
N vs CLL
0.988
97
97.3
0.998
N vs MPN
0.925
90.9
83
0.894
N vs MDS
0.841
82
70.1
0.818
Marginal vs CLL
0.987
98.7
91.6
0.983
CLL vs Mantle
0.993
96.6
95.8
0.99
AML vs MDS
0.883
86.1
69.8
0.871
Breast vs Colorectal
0.979
95.6
96.1
0.984
Lung vs Colorectal
0.972
98
92.9
0.979
Lung vs Breast
0.971
97.6
89.8
0.98
Breast vs Ovarian
0.966
100
91.2
0.987
Ovarian vs Endometrial
0.962
92
93.7
0.906
Pancreas vs Colorectal
0.978
98
91.9
0.979
Pancreas vs Esophageal
0.979
95.9
97.1
0.984
Hodgkin vs Normal LN
0.977
95.8
87.7
0.936
Hodgkin vs T-lymphoma
0.964
91.7
90.8
0.938
Hodgkin vs DLBCL
0.969
92.8
98.5
0.959
DLBCL vs Follicular
0.975
95.6
91
0.974
DLBCL vs T-lymphoma
0.963
91.1
89.7
0.944
Sarcoma vs Ovarian
0.983
94.9
98.4
0.984
Sarcoma vs Lung
0.99
98.6
96.3
0.99
Sarcoma vs GIST
1
99.3
100
1

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Developmental Therapeutics—Molecularly Targeted Agents and Tumor Biology

Track

Developmental Therapeutics—Molecularly Targeted Agents and Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Molecular Diagnostics and Imaging

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 3018)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3018

Abstract #

3018

Poster Bd #

10

Abstract Disclosures