Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Shahneen Sandhu , Gerhardt Attard , David Olmos , Eleni Efstathiou , Elena Castro , Dana E. Rathkopf , Matthew Raymond Smith , Guilhem Roubaud , Eric Jay Small , Andrea Juliana Gomes , Marniza Saad , Deniz Tural , Shibu Thomas , Karen Urtishak , Michael Gormley , Gary Mason , Brooke Diorio , George C. Wang , Angela Lopez-Gitlitz , Kim N. Chi
Background: NIRA + AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations in the Phase 3 MAGNTUDE study. There is a paucity of data supporting use of PARP inhibitors in pts with HRR gene alterations other than BRCA1/2. We report on the efficacy of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and a qualifying single gene HRR alteration other than BRCA1/2. Methods: A pre-specified analysis was undertaken of the primary endpoint (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS] by BICR), secondary endpoints (time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC], time to symptomatic progression [TSP], overall survival [OS]), as well as time to PSA progression (TPSA) and overall response rate (ORR) across 186 pts (91 randomized to NIRA + AAP, 95 to PBO + AAP) with an alteration in the ATM, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, or PALB2 gene (excluding cooccurring alterations). This analysis of individual alterations was not powered for formal statistical inference. Given the rarity of some alterations, groups based on functional similarity are also presented. Results: (Table). Pts with PALB2 or CHEK2 alterations had consistent improvement across all endpoints. In pts with ATM alterations benefit was observed in TCC, TSP, TPSA and ORR. There was benefit only in TPSA and ORR for pts with CDK12 alterations. When combined into functional groups, pts with an alteration in the HRR-Fanconi pathway (BRIP1, FANCA, and PALB2) as well as pts with a HRR associated alteration (CHEK2 or HDAC2) showed improvement in all endpoints. Conclusions: These data support the overall conclusions of the MAGNITUDE primary analysis and support benefit of NIRA + AAP in pts with HRR mutations beyond BRCA1/2. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641.
Single gene alteration, HR (95% CI) | PBO+ AAP (N) | Nira+ AAP (N) | rPFS | TCC | TSP | OS | TPSA | ORR (risk ratio) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HRR-Fanconi group | 14 | 17 | 0.59 (0.23, 1.45) | 0.68 (0.17, 2.74) | 0.90 (0.24, 3.37) | 0.43 (0.12, 1.50) | 0.65 (0.27, 1.59) | 1.5 (0.38, 6.00) |
BRIP1 | 4 | 4 | 0.23 (0.02, 2.26) | NE | 1.14 (0.10, 13.27) | NE | 0.98 (0.14, 7.00) | 0.5 (0.13, 2.00) |
FANCA | 6 | 5 | 1.07 (0.18, 6.44) | 0.51 (0.05, 5.16) | 1.23 (0.17, 8.74) | NE | 0.66 (0.13, 3.47) | NE |
PALB2 | 4 | 8 | 0.59 (0.15, 2.22) | 0.39 (0.02, 6.19) | 0.41 (0.03, 6.62) | 0.27 (0.05, 1.66) | 0.59 (0.16, 2.20) | 2 (0.33, 11.97) |
HRR associated group | 23 | 20 | 0.64 (0.26, 1.58) | 0.72 (0.19, 2.69) | 0.58 (0.17, 2.00) | 0.43 (0.13, 1.38) | 0.43 (0.17, 1.10) | 6.4 (0.96, 43.25) |
CHEK2 | 20 | 18 | 0.66 (0.25, 1.75) | 0.36 (0.07, 1.88) | 0.54 (0.14, 2.25) | 0.44 (0.12, 1.71) | 0.37 (0.14, 0.99) | NE |
HDAC2 | 3 | 2 | 0.71 (0.06, 8.02) | NE | 0.71 (0.04, 11.79) | 0.440 (0.04, 5.13) | NE | NE |
ATM | 42 | 43 | 1.11 (0.63, 1.99) | 0.26 (0.08, 0.80) | 0.75 (0.28, 2.00) | 1.07 (0.44, 2.65) | 0.73 (0.39, 1.36) | 3 (1.12, 8.13) |
CDK12 | 16 | 11 | 1.32 (0.43, 3.92) | 1.13 (0.27, 5.70) | 1.05 (0.28, 3.94) | 1.61 (0.49, 5.33) | 0.66 (0.24, 1.80) | 2.25 (0.64, 7.97) |
NE = not estimable due to few or no events.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Kim N. Chi
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Daniel Triner
2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Elena Castro
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Arthur Sillah