Gene-by-gene analysis in the MAGNITUDE study of niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations.

Authors

null

Shahneen Sandhu

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Shahneen Sandhu , Gerhardt Attard , David Olmos , Eleni Efstathiou , Elena Castro , Dana E. Rathkopf , Matthew Raymond Smith , Guilhem Roubaud , Eric Jay Small , Andrea Juliana Gomes , Marniza Saad , Deniz Tural , Shibu Thomas , Karen Urtishak , Michael Gormley , Gary Mason , Brooke Diorio , George C. Wang , Angela Lopez-Gitlitz , Kim N. Chi

Organizations

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, University College London, London, United Kingdom, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University Hospital Virgen de la Victoria (HUVV), Intercentre Clinical Management Unit (UGCI) of Medical Oncology, Málaga, Spain, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Liga Norte Riograndense Contra o Câncer, Natal, Brazil, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Titusville, NJ, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Los Angeles, CA, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: NIRA + AAP significantly improved outcomes in pts with mCRPC and HRR gene alterations in the Phase 3 MAGNTUDE study. There is a paucity of data supporting use of PARP inhibitors in pts with HRR gene alterations other than BRCA1/2. We report on the efficacy of NIRA + AAP in pts with mCRPC and a qualifying single gene HRR alteration other than BRCA1/2. Methods: A pre-specified analysis was undertaken of the primary endpoint (radiographic progression-free survival [rPFS] by BICR), secondary endpoints (time to cytotoxic chemotherapy [TCC], time to symptomatic progression [TSP], overall survival [OS]), as well as time to PSA progression (TPSA) and overall response rate (ORR) across 186 pts (91 randomized to NIRA + AAP, 95 to PBO + AAP) with an alteration in the ATM, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK2, FANCA, HDAC2, or PALB2 gene (excluding cooccurring alterations). This analysis of individual alterations was not powered for formal statistical inference. Given the rarity of some alterations, groups based on functional similarity are also presented. Results: (Table). Pts with PALB2 or CHEK2 alterations had consistent improvement across all endpoints. In pts with ATM alterations benefit was observed in TCC, TSP, TPSA and ORR. There was benefit only in TPSA and ORR for pts with CDK12 alterations. When combined into functional groups, pts with an alteration in the HRR-Fanconi pathway (BRIP1, FANCA, and PALB2) as well as pts with a HRR associated alteration (CHEK2 or HDAC2) showed improvement in all endpoints. Conclusions: These data support the overall conclusions of the MAGNITUDE primary analysis and support benefit of NIRA + AAP in pts with HRR mutations beyond BRCA1/2. Clinical trial information: NCT03748641.

Single gene alteration,

HR (95% CI)
PBO+ AAP

(N)
Nira+ AAP

(N)
rPFS
TCC
TSP
OS
TPSA


ORR

(risk ratio)
HRR-Fanconi group
14
17
0.59

(0.23, 1.45)
0.68

(0.17, 2.74)
0.90

(0.24, 3.37)
0.43

(0.12, 1.50)
0.65

(0.27, 1.59)
1.5

(0.38, 6.00)
BRIP1
4
4
0.23

(0.02, 2.26)
NE
1.14

(0.10, 13.27)
NE
0.98

(0.14, 7.00)
0.5

(0.13, 2.00)
FANCA
6
5
1.07

(0.18, 6.44)
0.51

(0.05, 5.16)
1.23

(0.17, 8.74)
NE
0.66

(0.13, 3.47)
NE
PALB2
4
8
0.59

(0.15, 2.22)
0.39

(0.02, 6.19)
0.41

(0.03, 6.62)
0.27

(0.05, 1.66)
0.59

(0.16, 2.20)
2

(0.33, 11.97)
HRR associated group
23
20
0.64

(0.26, 1.58)
0.72

(0.19, 2.69)
0.58

(0.17, 2.00)
0.43

(0.13, 1.38)
0.43

(0.17, 1.10)
6.4

(0.96, 43.25)
CHEK2
20
18
0.66

(0.25, 1.75)
0.36

(0.07, 1.88)
0.54

(0.14, 2.25)
0.44

(0.12, 1.71)
0.37

(0.14, 0.99)
NE
HDAC2
3
2
0.71

(0.06, 8.02)
NE
0.71

(0.04, 11.79)
0.440

(0.04, 5.13)
NE
NE
ATM
42
43
1.11

(0.63, 1.99)
0.26

(0.08, 0.80)
0.75

(0.28, 2.00)
1.07

(0.44, 2.65)
0.73

(0.39, 1.36)
3

(1.12, 8.13)
CDK12
16
11
1.32

(0.43, 3.92)
1.13

(0.27, 5.70)
1.05

(0.28, 3.94)
1.61

(0.49, 5.33)
0.66

(0.24, 1.80)
2.25

(0.64, 7.97)

NE = not estimable due to few or no events.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer– Advanced/Castrate-Resistant

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03748641

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5020)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5020

Abstract #

5020

Poster Bd #

204

Abstract Disclosures