Clinical predictors of longer survival in patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma receiving immunotherapy prior to BRAF/MEK inhibition in the metastatic setting.

Authors

null

Adriana Matutino Kahn

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Adriana Matutino Kahn , Curtis Perry , Katrina Etts , Harriet M. Kluger , Mario Sznol

Organizations

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, Yale Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital of the Yale–New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma are typically treated with immunotherapy in the first-line setting, followed by BRAF/MEKi upon disease progression based on an absolute 20% improvement in 2-year overall survival over initial treatment with BRAF/MEKi in the DREAMseq trial. Our goal was to identify clinical predictors of longer survival for patients treated in our institution with this approach. Methods: We identified 40 patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma treated at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with immunotherapy followed by BRAF/MEKi upon progression. Clinical data were collected and analyzed by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. Favorable outcome was defined as survival > 2 years (y) after starting BRAF/MEKis. Results: Median follow up was 33 months (m, 3 – 172 m). Median age was 54 y (20 - 83). Most patients were female (n = 24, %). Most patients were initially treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 34, 85%), with 13 of these patients (38%) tolerating all 4 cycles of initial ipilimumab. Adverse events of any grade were seen in 28 (70%) patients after first-line immunotherapy, with the most common being hepatitis, colitis, hypothyroidism, rash, and fatigue. Median duration of first-line immunotherapy was 3.5 m (.75 - 42.5 m). Most common sites of progression on immunotherapy were lymph nodes (n = 14, 35%), liver (n = 12, 30%), bone (n = 10, 25%) and brain (n = 10, 25%). Prior to BRAF/MEKis, median ECOG-PS was 1 (0-4) and median LDH was 268 mg/dL (151 - 11,300). Most common BRAF/MEKi regimen was dabrafenib plus trametinib (n = 34, 85%). Adverse events of any grade were seen in 30 (75%) patients, with the most common being fever, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. Best response to BRAF/MEKi was CR (n = 4, 10%), PR (n = 26, 65%), SD (n = 4, 10%) and PD (n = 6, 15%), and at the data cutoff, 35 (87.5%) patients progressed on BRAF/MEKi. Median duration of BRAF/MEK inhibition was 7 m (0.5 – 106 m). Median survival since starting BRAF/MEKi was 19.2 m (1.7 – 106 m). On multivariable analyses assessing predictors of survival, presence of bone metastases after disease progression on first-line immunotherapy was associated with worse 2-year survival after initiation of BRAF/MEKi (OR 2.5, 95% CI, 0.51-5.6, p = 0.0121). Other factors, such as ECOG-PS 0-2, normal LDH prior to BRAF/MEKi, and age at metastatic diagnosis < 60 years were not significantly associated with longer survival after initiation of BRAF/MEKi. Conclusions: We showed that the presence of bone metastases upon progression on first-line immunotherapy was associated with worse 2-y survival on salvage BRAF/MEKi for patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers for long-term response to both immunotherapy and BRAF/MEKi are needed to optimize treatment strategies and patient outcomes.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 9555)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9555

Abstract #

9555

Poster Bd #

148

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts